These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26399057)
1. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2015/8 Case of Dubská and Krejzová v. The Czech Republic, 11 December 2014, nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12 (Former Fifth Section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2015 Apr; 22(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 26399057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling. Chervenak FA; Grünebaum A; Arabin B; McCullough LB BJOG; 2017 Sep; 124(10):1472-1473. PubMed ID: 28440904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. European Court of Human Rights Rulings in Home Birth Set to Cause Trouble for the Future: A Review of Two Cases. Chen CY; Cheeseman M Med Law Rev; 2017 Feb; 25(1):115-125. PubMed ID: 27273920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2011/6 Case of Ternovszky v. Hungary, 14 December 2010, no. 67545/09 (Second Section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2011 Mar; 18(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 21644439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The choice of child delivery is a European human right. Eggermont M Eur J Health Law; 2012 Jun; 19(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 22916533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflections on human rights as a reality for women and midwives. Murphy-Lawless J Pract Midwife; 2015 Oct; 18(9):14-7. PubMed ID: 26638648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwifery and the constitution. Smith EL Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (65):33-5. PubMed ID: 12710149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/5. Case of V.C .v. Slovakia, 8 November 2011, no. 18968/07 (former Section IV). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 22558660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Home sweet home. A place to deliver, care for, and raise our children. Chmell A J Leg Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 22439712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SA government proposes to limit homebirth practitioners. Qld Nurse; 2013 Oct; 32(5):37. PubMed ID: 24325023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ECHR 2013/8 case of Sýkora v. the Czech Republic, 22 November 2012, no. 23419/07 (fifth section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2013 Apr; 20(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 23772467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Homebirth in Czech Republic]. Konigsmarkova I Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Dec; 77(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 23570079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse is guilty of misconduct. Pract Midwife; 2000 Dec; 3(11):7. PubMed ID: 12026572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating midwifery. Parallels in Texas and British Columbia. Johnson G Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):29-31. PubMed ID: 11984896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The birth of a midwife (with a long latent phase). Waechter M Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (72):36, 67. PubMed ID: 15651452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Arizona regulations. Cleckner W Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2011; (99):6. PubMed ID: 21999045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ECHR 2013/7 case of Bures v. the Czech Republic, 18 October 2012, no. 37679/08 (fifth section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2013 Apr; 20(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 23772466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Homebirth in Australia. The personal and the political. Buckley S Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (66):49-50. PubMed ID: 12848047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2011/9 Case of Hoffer and Annen v. Germany, 13 January 2011, nos. 397/07 and 2322/07 (Fifth Section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2011 Mar; 18(2):235-7. PubMed ID: 21644442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]