162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26399678)
1. Response to Stephens and Heitman.
Wasserman JA
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 26399678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasoning Backwards by Design: Commentary on "Moral Reasoning among HEC Members".
Stephens AL; Heitman E
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 26132058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral Reasoning among HEC Members: An Empirical Evaluation of the Relationship of Theory and Practice in Clinical Ethics Consultation.
Wasserman JA; Stevenson SL; Claxton C; Krug EF
J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 26132057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Teaching nonauthoritarian clinical ethics: using an inventory of bioethical positions.
Fiester A
Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 25739778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reinvigorating ethics consultations: an impetus from the "quality" debate.
Nilson EG; Fins JJ
HEC Forum; 2006 Dec; 18(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 17717754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure.
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25562222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics consultants: a self-portrait of decision makers.
Bermel J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Dec; 15(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics committees and consultants.
Singer PA; Pellegrino ED; Siegler M
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 2131080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Solving the doctor's dilemma?
Elliott C
New Sci; 1992 Jan; 133(1803):42-4. PubMed ID: 11656143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.
Fox E; Arnold RM
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 8889888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The armchair ethicist: it's all about location.
Diekema DS
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):227-32, discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists.
Churchill LR
Daedalus; 1999; 128(4):253-74. PubMed ID: 11645877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical ethics cases: moral conflict or confusion?
Kanoti GA
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 8219317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An enhanced methodology for conflicts in ethics consultation.
Whisnand D
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995-1996 Winter; 9(4):1-11. PubMed ID: 11660150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New approaches with surrogate decision makers.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 25517562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics support in clinical practice in Europe--situation overview.
Gadd E
Med Etika Bioet; 2005; 11(Suppl.):4-5. PubMed ID: 16607714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to open peer commentaries on "Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure".
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):W9-10. PubMed ID: 25562246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Power hierarchy and epistemic injustice in clinical ethics consultation.
Ho A; Unger D
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 25562225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond the recommendation: discerning achievable goals in clinical ethics consultation.
Fanning JB; Garrison NA; Churchill LR
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 25562226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When decisions are life-and-death: patients and their families are increasingly turning to hospital ethicists to help them make tough calls on treatments.
Guyer RL
USA Weekend; 1998 Feb 6-8; ():26. PubMed ID: 11647321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
