220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26400321)
1. Setup errors in cone-beam computed tomography and their effects on acute radiation toxicity in cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Xin S
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Sep; 14(3):10937-43. PubMed ID: 26400321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity.
Rudat V; Nour A; Hammoud M; Alaradi A; Mohammed A
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Feb; 192(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 26545764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization and quality assurance of an image-guided radiation therapy system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy radiotherapy.
Tsai JS; Micaily B; Miyamoto C
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 22417899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exposure Risks Among Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Considerations in the Era of Image Guided Radiation Therapy.
Hess CB; Thompson HM; Benedict SH; Seibert JA; Wong K; Vaughan AT; Chen AM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Apr; 94(5):978-92. PubMed ID: 27026304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of interfraction patient setup for head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy using multiple computed tomography-based image guidance.
Qi XS; Hu AY; Lee SP; Lee P; DeMarco J; Li XA; Steinberg ML; Kupelian P; Low D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 23474111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The residual setup errors of different IGRT alignment procedures for head and neck IMRT and the resulting dosimetric impact.
Graff P; Kirby N; Weinberg V; Chen J; Yom SS; Lambert L; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 May; 86(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 23245281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies for radiation therapy localization and delivery.
De Los Santos J; Popple R; Agazaryan N; Bayouth JE; Bissonnette JP; Bucci MK; Dieterich S; Dong L; Forster KM; Indelicato D; Langen K; Lehmann J; Mayr N; Parsai I; Salter W; Tomblyn M; Yuh WT; Chetty IJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 23664076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of three-dimensional setup errors in image-guided pelvic radiotherapy for uterine and cervical cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography and its effect on planning target volume margins.
Patni N; Burela N; Pasricha R; Goyal J; Soni TP; Kumar TS; Natarajan T
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(1):131-136. PubMed ID: 28508846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreased acute toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with prostate-based versus bone-based image guidance.
Nakamura K; Mizowaki T; Inokuchi H; Ikeda I; Inoue T; Kamba T; Ogawa O; Hiraoka M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Feb; 23(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 28756594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical feasibility and performance of an orthogonal X-ray imaging system for image-guided radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: Comparison with cone-beam CT.
Zhao LR; Zhou YB; Li GH; Li QM; Yang DQ; Li HX; Wan JQ; Sun JG
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):266-71. PubMed ID: 26703446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification and Assessment of Interfraction Setup Errors Based on Cone Beam CT and Determination of Safety Margins for Radiotherapy.
Cubillos Mesías M; Boda-Heggemann J; Thoelking J; Lohr F; Wenz F; Wertz H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150326. PubMed ID: 26930196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-Dose Image-Guided Pediatric CNS Radiation Therapy: Final Analysis From a Prospective Low-Dose Cone-Beam CT Protocol From a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium.
Alcorn SR; Zhou XC; Bojechko C; Rubo RA; Chen MJ; Dieckmann K; Ermoian RP; Ford EC; Kobyzeva D; MacDonald SM; McNutt TR; Nechesnyuk A; Nilsson K; Sjostrand H; Smith KS; Stock M; Tryggestad EJ; Villar RC; Winey BA; Terezakis SA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820920650. PubMed ID: 32329413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of setup error based on CTVision for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during IGRT.
Zhang S; Zhou X; Zhang Q; Jiang S; Wang R; Zhang G; Lei H; Lin S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):15-24. PubMed ID: 27455481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image guided radiotherapy compared with non-IGRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Zelefsky MJ; Kollmeier M; Cox B; Fidaleo A; Sperling D; Pei X; Carver B; Coleman J; Lovelock M; Hunt M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Sep; 84(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 22330997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positioning accuracy during VMAT of gynecologic malignancies and the resulting dosimetric impact by a 6-degree-of-freedom couch in combination with daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography.
Yao L; Zhu L; Wang J; Liu L; Zhou S; Jiang S; Cao Q; Qu A; Tian S
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():104. PubMed ID: 25927659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image-guided radiotherapy protocols.
Abubakar A; Zamri NAM; Shaukat SI; Mohd Zin H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):137-146. PubMed ID: 34109736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the use of different imaging and delivery techniques for cranial treatments on the Halcyon linac.
Flores-Martinez E; Cerviño LI; Pawlicki T; Kim GY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 31738473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
