143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26400557)
1. [Harmonization of Standardized Uptake Value among Different Generation PET/ CT Cameras Based on a Phantom Experiment -Utility of SUV(peak)].
Akamatsu G; Nishida H; Fujino A; Ohnishi A; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 71(9):735-45. PubMed ID: 26400557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function in SUV quantification for oncological PET.
Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Peñuelas I; Richter JÁ; Martí-Climent JM
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodal Partial-Volume Correction: Application to 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Metastases Studies.
Grecchi E; O'Doherty J; Veronese M; Tsoumpas C; Cook GJ; Turkheimer FE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1408-14. PubMed ID: 26182970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of different contrast medium concentrations and injection protocols on quantitative and clinical assessment of FDG-PET/CT in lung cancer.
Verburg FA; Kuhl CK; Pietsch H; Palmowski M; Mottaghy FM; Behrendt FF
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e617-22. PubMed ID: 23880426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.
Strobel K; Rüdy M; Treyer V; Veit-Haibach P; Burger C; Hany TF
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 17538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of lesion detectability and standardized uptake value according to the acquisition procedure and reconstruction among five PET scanners.
Takahashi Y; Oriuchi N; Otake H; Endo K; Murase K
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 18670864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT.
Zytoon AA; Murakami K; El-Kholy MR; El-Shorbagy E; Ebied O
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 18395387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.
Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
