BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26401834)

  • 1. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants.
    George SS; Shivdasani MN; Wise AK; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066005. PubMed ID: 26401834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.
    George SS; Wise AK; Shivdasani MN; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):065003. PubMed ID: 25420148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in long-term deafened cats.
    George SS; Wise AK; Fallon JB; Shepherd RK
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Jun; 12(3):036003. PubMed ID: 25834113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.
    George SS; Shivdasani MN; Fallon JB
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):1104-16. PubMed ID: 27306672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL; Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL; Middlebrooks JC; Bonham BH
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM; Delgutte B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spread of activation and interaction between channels with multi-channel optogenetic stimulation in the mouse cochlea.
    Azees AA; Thompson AC; Thomas R; Zhou J; Ruther P; Wise AK; Ajay EA; Garrett DJ; Quigley A; Fallon JB; Richardson RT
    Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 440():108911. PubMed ID: 37977051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Restriction of Neural Activation Using Focused Multipolar Stimulation With a Retinal Prosthesis.
    Spencer TC; Fallon JB; Thien PC; Shivdasani MN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3181-91. PubMed ID: 27309622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility.
    Mesnildrey Q; Macherey O
    Hear Res; 2015 Jan; 319():32-47. PubMed ID: 25449010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Favre E; Pelizzone M
    Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 66(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 8509306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focused electrical stimulation using a single current source.
    Senn P; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Oct; 15(5):056018. PubMed ID: 29967310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.