182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26402127)
1. Molecular and Functional Imaging of Bone Metastases in Breast and Prostate Cancers: An Overview.
Azad GK; Taylor B; Rubello D; Colletti PM; Goh V; Cook GJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 41(1):e44-50. PubMed ID: 26402127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial.
Jambor I; Kuisma A; Ramadan S; Huovinen R; Sandell M; Kajander S; Kemppainen J; Kauppila E; Auren J; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Noponen T; Minn H; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25833330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases with 18F-NaF and 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT.
Beheshti M; Rezaee A; Geinitz H; Loidl W; Pirich C; Langsteger W
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(Suppl 3):55S-60S. PubMed ID: 27694173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Gou Z; Wu R; Yuan Y; Yu G; Zhao Y
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1915-1924. PubMed ID: 31127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-individual comparison of
Bénard F; Harsini S; Wilson D; Zukotynski K; Abikhzer G; Turcotte E; Cossette M; Metser U; Romsa J; Martin M; Mar C; Saad F; Soucy JP; Eigl BJ; Black P; Krauze A; Burrell S; Nichol A; Tardif JC
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1499-1507. PubMed ID: 36343655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-choline, and 18F-fluoride in bone imaging with emphasis on prostate and breast.
Langsteger W; Heinisch M; Fogelman I
Semin Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 36(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 16356797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of the Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases: Is It Feasible to Compare 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and 99mTc-methyl Diphosphonate Bone Scintigraphy?
Pietrzak AK; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):242-247. PubMed ID: 29681049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A literature review of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 18F-choline or 11C-choline PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; van der Ploeg T; Knol RJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Oct; 34(10):935-45. PubMed ID: 23903557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET.
Schirrmeister H; Guhlmann A; Elsner K; Kotzerke J; Glatting G; Rentschler M; Neumaier B; Träger H; Nüssle K; Reske SN
J Nucl Med; 1999 Oct; 40(10):1623-9. PubMed ID: 10520701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Kulshrestha RK; Vinjamuri S; England A; Nightingale J; Hogg P
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Dec; 44(4):217-222. PubMed ID: 27634981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which metabolic imaging, besides bone scan with 99mTc-phosphonates, for detecting and evaluating bone metastases in prostatic cancer patients? An open discussion.
Bombardieri E; Setti L; Kirienko M; Antunovic L; Guglielmo P; Ciocia G
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 59(4):381-99. PubMed ID: 26337240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET/CT vs Bone Scintigraphy in Treatment Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Al-Muqbel KM; Yaghan RJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(21):e3753. PubMed ID: 27227942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT for assessing bone involvement in prostate and breast cancers.
Withofs N; Grayet B; Tancredi T; Rorive A; Mella C; Giacomelli F; Mievis F; Aerts J; Waltregny D; Jerusalem G; Hustinx R
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Mar; 32(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 21076343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparative study of
Fonager RF; Zacho HD; Langkilde NC; Fledelius J; Ejlersen JA; Hendel HW; Haarmark C; Moe M; Mortensen JC; Jochumsen MR; Petersen LJ
Acta Oncol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 29447047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of hormone receptor status in comparison of 18F -FDG-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for evaluating bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: single center experience.
Teke F; Teke M; Inal A; Kaplan MA; Kucukoner M; Aksu R; Urakci Z; Tasdemir B; Isikdogan A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):387-91. PubMed ID: 25640386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
