These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640241)

  • 1. Surgical retrieval and histologic evaluation of an endosteal implant: a case report with clinical, radiographic and microscopic observations.
    Gross HN; Holmes RE
    J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 2640241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report.
    Trisi P; Keith DJ; Rocco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 15747684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts.
    Trisi P; Marcato C; Todisco M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Oct; 23(5):427-37. PubMed ID: 14620117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.
    Vernino AR; Kohles SS; Holt RA; Lee HM; Caudill RF; Kenealy JN
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12212687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A histomorphometric comparison of the bone graft-titanium interface between interpositional and onlay/inlay bone grafting techniques.
    Sjöström M; Lundgren S; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 16519182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs.
    Parr GR; Steflik DE; Sisk AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):534-40. PubMed ID: 8112793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human peri-implant bone response to turned and oxidized titanium implants inserted and retrieved after 2 months.
    Shibli JA; Grassi S; de Figueiredo LC; Feres M; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 17846541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate implant placement and GBR in humans: a case report and histologic evaluation.
    Fugazzotto PA
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Oct; 19(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 10709511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
    Jensen OT; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 9714958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fate of the HA coating of loaded implants in the augmented sinus floor: a human case study of retrieved implants.
    de Lange G; Tadjoedin E
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Jun; 22(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 12186351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone healing at a failed implant site in a type II diabetic patient: clinical and histologic evaluations: a case report.
    Park JB
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 17410909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
    Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of calcitonin on bone formation around titanium implant. A histometric study in rabbits.
    Januário AL; Sallum EA; de Toledo S; Sallum AW; Nociti JF
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 11696910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osseointegration of titanium implants in bone regenerated in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible.
    Buser D; Ruskin J; Higginbottom F; Hardwick R; Dahlin C; Schenk RK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 8530169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
    Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Nakajima Y; Weber HP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.