241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26403279)
1. Effect of S53P4 bone substitute on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation on other implant materials in normal and hypoxic conditions.
Pérez-Tanoira R; García-Pedrazuela M; Hyyrynen T; Soininen A; Aarnisalo A; Nieminen MT; Tiainen VM; Konttinen YT; Kinnari TJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Sep; 26(9):239. PubMed ID: 26403279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro.
Coraça-Huber DC; Fille M; Hausdorfer J; Putzer D; Nogler M
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 24108602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of S53P4 bioactive glass on osteoblastic cell and biomaterial surface interaction.
Pérez-Tanoira R; Kinnari TJ; Hyyrynen T; Soininen A; Pietola L; Tiainen VM; Konttinen YT; Aarnisalo AA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Oct; 26(10):246. PubMed ID: 26411442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioactive Glass Granules Inhibit Mature Bacterial Biofilms on the Surfaces of Cochlear Implants.
Höing B; Kirchhoff L; Arnolds J; Hussain T; Buer J; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Steinmann J
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e985-e991. PubMed ID: 30334871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro anti-biofilm activity of a biphasic gentamicin-loaded calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute.
Butini ME; Cabric S; Trampuz A; Di Luca M
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2018 Jan; 161():252-260. PubMed ID: 29096369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The in vitro antibacterial effect of S53P4 bioactive glass and gentamicin impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads.
Gergely I; Zazgyva A; Man A; Zuh SG; Pop TS
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2014 Jun; 61(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 24939683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm formation on bone grafts and bone graft substitutes: comparison of different materials by a standard in vitro test and microcalorimetry.
Clauss M; Trampuz A; Borens O; Bohner M; Ilchmann T
Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3791-7. PubMed ID: 20226886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Formation and retention of staphylococcal biofilms on DLC and its hybrids compared to metals used as biomaterials.
Myllymaa K; Levon J; Tiainen VM; Myllymaa S; Soininen A; Korhonen H; Kaivosoja E; Lappalainen R; Konttinen YT
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2013 Jan; 101():290-7. PubMed ID: 23010032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Berberine inhibits Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion and biofilm formation on the surface of titanium alloy.
Wang X; Qiu S; Yao X; Tang T; Dai K; Zhu Z
J Orthop Res; 2009 Nov; 27(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 19472377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antibiofilm agents against MDR bacterial strains: is bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 also effective?
Bortolin M; De Vecchi E; Romanò CL; Toscano M; Mattina R; Drago L
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2016 Jan; 71(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 26462989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P4.
Drago L; Vassena C; Fenu S; De Vecchi E; Signori V; De Francesco R; Romanò CL
Future Microbiol; 2014; 9(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 24957087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofilm-based implant infections in orthopaedics.
Arciola CR; Campoccia D; Ehrlich GD; Montanaro L
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 830():29-46. PubMed ID: 25366219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced activity of carvacrol against biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in an acidic environment.
Nostro A; Cellini L; Zimbalatti V; Blanco AR; Marino A; Pizzimenti F; Di Giulio M; Bisignano G
APMIS; 2012 Dec; 120(12):967-73. PubMed ID: 23030501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro oxidant effects of D-glucosamine reduce adhesión and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Aiassa V; Barnes AI; Albesa I
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2012; 44(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 22610292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of selected properties of Staphylococcus epidermidis to biofilm formation on orthopedic implants].
Nowicka J; Bartoszewicz M; Gościniak G
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2012; 64(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 23285772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of incubation atmosphere on the production and composition of staphylococcal biofilms.
Asai K; Yamada K; Yagi T; Baba H; Kawamura I; Ohta M
J Infect Chemother; 2015 Jan; 21(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25454214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of thiazolidione derivatives against clinical staphylococcus strains.
Liu H; Zhao Y; Zhao D; Gong T; Wu Y; Han H; Xu T; Peschel A; Han S; Qu D
Emerg Microbes Infect; 2015 Jan; 4(1):e1. PubMed ID: 26038759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients.
Barbieri R; Pesce M; Franchelli S; Baldelli I; De Maria A; Marchese A
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 25888077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.
Shanks RM; Sargent JL; Martinez RM; Graber ML; O'Toole GA
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2247-55. PubMed ID: 16627606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Submicron-textured biomaterial surface reduces staphylococcal bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.
Xu LC; Siedlecki CA
Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 21884831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
