330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26403898)
1. Creation of the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) distracted driving dataset.
Owens JM; Angell L; Hankey JM; Foley J; Ebe K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():33-6. PubMed ID: 26403898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multitasking additional-to-driving: Prevalence, structure, and associated risk in SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.
Bálint A; Flannagan CAC; Leslie A; Klauer S; Guo F; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105455. PubMed ID: 32036106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of age and secondary task engagement on motor vehicle crashes in a naturalistic setting.
Calvo JA; Baldwin C; Philips B
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():297-302. PubMed ID: 32563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of driver distraction and secondary tasks with and without other co-occurring driving behaviors on the level of road traffic crashes.
Jazayeri A; Martinez JRB; Loeb HS; Yang CC
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Apr; 153():106010. PubMed ID: 33611082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of driver engagement in secondary tasks from observed naturalistic driving behavior.
Ye M; Osman OA; Ishak S; Hashemi B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():385-391. PubMed ID: 28719829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data.
Arvin R; Kamrani M; Khattak AJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105226. PubMed ID: 31465934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.
Wang B; Hallmark S; Savolainen P; Dong J
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():163-169. PubMed ID: 29203015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the effects of critical driving situations on driver perception time (PT) using SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
Wu KF; Lin YJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():94-102. PubMed ID: 30991292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mining patterns of near-crash events with and without secondary tasks.
Kong X; Das S; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106162. PubMed ID: 33984756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How safe is tuning a radio?: using the radio tuning task as a benchmark for distracted driving.
Lee JY; Lee JD; Bärgman J; Lee J; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():29-37. PubMed ID: 29101787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Near crash characteristics among risky drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Hannan C; Rogers R; Belwadi A; Loeb H
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():263-269. PubMed ID: 32563402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of road traffic context on secondary task engagement while driving.
Cuentas-Hernandez S; Li X; King MJ; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1139373. PubMed ID: 37077849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognising safety critical events: can automatic video processing improve naturalistic data analyses?
Dozza M; González NP
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():298-304. PubMed ID: 23489911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
