These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Darrith B; Courtney PM; Della Valle CJ Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 29305445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty. Rahman WA; AmenĂ¡bar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cementation of a Dual Mobility Construct in Recurrently Dislocating and High Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Arthroplasty. Chalmers BP; Ledford CK; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1501-1506. PubMed ID: 29273288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Salvage of a monoblock metal-on-metal cup using a dual mobility liner: a two-year MRI follow-up study. Kasparek MF; Renner L; Faschingbauer M; Waldstein W; Rueckl K; Boettner F Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 28929204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision of Failed Hip Resurfacing and Large Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Dual-Mobility Components. Snir N; Park BK; Garofolo G; Marwin SE Orthopedics; 2015 Jun; 38(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 26091212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a monoblock dual-mobility acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation. Yang J; Bryan AJ; Drabchuk R; Tetreault MW; Calkins TE; Della Valle CJ Hip Int; 2022 Sep; 32(5):648-655. PubMed ID: 33566709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Soranoglou VG; Poultsides LA; Sculco PK; Sculco TP Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. PubMed ID: 28042114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptically Failed Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Salmons HI; Fruth KM; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ; Abdel MP J Arthroplasty; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2399-2405. PubMed ID: 35738361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention of Monoblock Femoral Components Using a Dual Mobility Bearing: A Report of 3 Cases. Kiran M; Peter V JBJS Case Connect; 2020; 10(3):e19.00641. PubMed ID: 32618611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Damage Assessment of Retrieved Birmingham Monoblock Cups: Is Conversion to Dual-Mobility Head a Viable Revision Option? Gascoyne TC; Lanting BA; Derksen KJ; Teeter MG; Turgeon TR J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1242-1246. PubMed ID: 29276120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA. Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Poor short term outcome with a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Levy YD; Ezzet KA J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1212-7. PubMed ID: 23538122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Outcomes Following Revision of Monoblock Metal on Metal Acetabular Components for Painful Micromotion in the Absence of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction to Metal. Konan S; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):915-918. PubMed ID: 27776910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option? Affatato S; Castiello E; Amendola L; Comitini S; Prudhon JL; Tigani D Materials (Basel); 2020 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 32349434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]