376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26405184)
1. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results.
Williams R
Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Irreproducible results in preclinical cardiovascular research: opportunities in times of need.
Sipido KR
Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Mar; 115(3):e34-e36. PubMed ID: 30789233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keeping us all honest: publication ethics and AJA.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2014 Jun; 33(2):71. PubMed ID: 24902484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.
Leopold SS; Porcher R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):929-932. PubMed ID: 28124297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [New guidelines on good scientific practice].
Nielsen OH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 May; 171(22):1847-9. PubMed ID: 19486614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistics: all together now, one step at a time.
Drummond GB; Paterson DJ; McLoughlin P; McGrath JC
J Physiol; 2011 Apr; 589(Pt 8):1859. PubMed ID: 21498377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The conclusion of papers published in the Journal should be supported by an appropriate statistical analysis.
Blackstone EH; Weisel RD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2479. PubMed ID: 25433871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?
Krumholz HM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 22811497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inaction over retractions of identified fraudulent publications: ongoing weakness in the system of scientific self-correction.
Wiedermann CJ
Account Res; 2018; 25(4):239-253. PubMed ID: 29514510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
