These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640531)

  • 21. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Placement and replacement of dental restorations.
    Mahmood S; Chohan AN; Al-Jannakh M; Al-Baker H; Smales RJ
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Oct; 14(10):589-92. PubMed ID: 15456546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population.
    MacInnis WA; Ismail A; Brogan H
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Mar; 57(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 2043998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Thylstrup A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Dec; 44(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 3469862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes for early childhood caries: influence of aggressive dental surgery.
    Graves CE; Berkowitz RJ; Proskin HM; Chase I; Weinstein P; Billings R
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 15587091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Amalgam and composite restorations: reasons for placement and replacement].
    Toffenetti F
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Mar; 59(4):44-8, 51-3. PubMed ID: 2070917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reasons for placement of restorations on previously unrestored tooth surfaces by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Nascimento MM; Gordan VV; Qvist V; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Williams OD; Fellows JL; Ritchie LK; Mjör IA; McClelland J; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Apr; 141(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20354094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam.
    Mjör IA
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3316042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.