These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26405731)

  • 1. Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis.
    Lajeunesse MJ
    Ecology; 2015 Aug; 96(8):2056-63. PubMed ID: 26405731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs.
    Lajeunessei MJ
    Ecology; 2011 Nov; 92(11):2049-55. PubMed ID: 22164829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Monte Carlo experiments to select meta-analytic estimators.
    Hong S; Reed WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):192-215. PubMed ID: 33150663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional validation sampling for consistent risk estimation with binary outcome data subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Farrell PJ; Krewski D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 30746841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyzing dependent correlations with correction for artifacts that multiplicatively attenuate the true correlation.
    Cheung SF; Chan DK; Sun RW
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):793-810. PubMed ID: 30136040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets.
    White NA; Engeman RM; Sugihara RT; Krupa HW
    BMC Ecol; 2008 Apr; 8():6. PubMed ID: 18416853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of variance estimators for meta-analysis of instrumental variable estimates.
    Schmidt AF; Hingorani AD; Jefferis BJ; White J; Groenwold R; Dudbridge F;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1975-1986. PubMed ID: 27591262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of rare binary events in treatment groups with unequal variability.
    Li L; Wang X
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):263-274. PubMed ID: 28760075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation to the meta-analysis of safety data.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):254-62. PubMed ID: 23379761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta-analyses.
    Huang H
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):526-543. PubMed ID: 36916486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.