BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640601)

  • 1. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
    Grose LG
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring and validating a nurse's caring performance.
    Smith LS
    Adv Clin Care; 1990; 5(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2328068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combing BARS and MBO6: using an appraisal system to diagnose performance problems.
    Schneier CE; Beatty RW
    Pers Adm; 1979 Sep; 24(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 10243666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance appraisals that fit.
    Oliver JE
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):66-71. PubMed ID: 10271647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Educators in action: evaluating performance.
    Hollander EC
    Tex Hosp; 1979 Jul; 35(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10243343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The design and implementation of task oriented employee evaluations.
    Hanna KJ; Sobecki DF
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Jun; 19(6):405-8, 411-3. PubMed ID: 10266567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two goals in every performance appraisal.
    Baker HK; Morgan PI
    Pers J; 1984 Sep; 63(9):74-8. PubMed ID: 10268092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing and implementing a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale System: the Brook Lane Psychiatric Center experience.
    Kolva CO
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2640602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
    Beck S
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MBO--is it passé?
    O'Donnell M; O'Donnell RJ
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1983; 28(5):46-58. PubMed ID: 10263880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
    Nadzam DM
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
    Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The position analysis: single source for multiple applications.
    McConnell CR
    Health Care Superv; 1988 Jul; 6(4):72-84. PubMed ID: 10288360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance appraisal for community health nurses through self-appraisal and goal setting.
    Knox LJ; MacKay RC
    Nurs Pap; 1982; 14(3):17-31. PubMed ID: 6925788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.