331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26406016)
1. Hemodynamics analyses in treated and untreated carotid arteries of the same patient: A preliminary study based on three patient cases.
Mei Y; Müller-Eschner M; Yi J; Zhang Z; Chen D; Kronlage M; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Kauczor HU; Böckler D; Demirel S
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S299-309. PubMed ID: 26406016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of morphological and rheological conditions between conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy using computational fluid dynamics--a pilot study.
Demirel S; Chen D; Mei Y; Partovi S; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Dadrich M; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Müller-Eschner M
Vascular; 2015 Oct; 23(5):474-82. PubMed ID: 25298137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.
Wells DR; Archie JP; Kleinstreuer C
J Vasc Surg; 1996 Apr; 23(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 8627904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics.
Harrison GJ; How TV; Poole RJ; Brennan JA; Naik JB; Vallabhaneni SR; Fisher RK
J Vasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 60(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 24657293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational fluid dynamics of carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting based on postoperative patient-specific computed tomography angiography and ultrasound flow data.
Hayase H; Tokunaga K; Nakayama T; Sugiu K; Nishida A; Arimitsu S; Hishikawa T; Ono S; Ohta M; Date I
Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):1096-101; discussion 1101. PubMed ID: 21221041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A computational evaluation of sedentary lifestyle effects on carotid hemodynamics and atherosclerotic events incidence.
Caruso MV; Serra R; Perri P; Buffone G; Caliò FG; DE Franciscis S; Fragomeni F
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(3):42-52. PubMed ID: 29205211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.
Sui B; Gao P; Lin Y; Jing L; Sun S; Qin H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Personalized brain revascularization: computer modeling of the reconstruction zone for carotid endarterectomy].
Kazantsev AN; Burkov NN; Zakharov YN; Borisov VG; Lider RY; Bayandin MS; Anufriev AI
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2020; (6):71-75. PubMed ID: 32573535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in carotid endarterectomy].
Pokrovskiĭ AV; Ermoliuk RS; Kuntsevich GI; Mal'kova MV; Smol'nikov PV
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1991 Jan; (1):16-23. PubMed ID: 2041310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational Fluid-Dynamic Analysis after Carotid Endarterectomy: Patch Graft versus Direct Suture Closure.
Domanin M; Buora A; Scardulla F; Guerciotti B; Forzenigo L; Biondetti P; Vergara C
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 44():325-335. PubMed ID: 28479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamics and wall mechanics in human carotid bifurcation and its consequences for atherogenesis: investigation of inter-individual variation.
Younis HF; Kaazempur-Mofrad MR; Chan RC; Isasi AG; Hinton DP; Chau AH; Kim LA; Kamm RD
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2004 Sep; 3(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 15300454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound.
Ringer AJ; German JW; Guterman LR; Hopkins LN
Neurosurgery; 2002 Sep; 51(3):639-43; discussion 643. PubMed ID: 12188941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element model of the patched human carotid.
Kamenskiy AV; Pipinos II; Desyatova AS; Salkovskiy YE; Yu Kossovich L; Kirillova IV; Bockeria LA; Morozov KM; Polyaev VO; Lynch TG; Dzenis YA
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2009 Dec; 43(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 19828588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Case Report: Evaluating Biomechanical Risk Factors in Carotid Stenosis by Patient-Specific Fluid-Structural Interaction Biomechanical Analysis.
Wang J; Mendieta JB; Paritala PK; Xiang Y; Raffel OC; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021; 50(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 33744885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational fluid dynamic comparison between patch-based and primary closure techniques after carotid endarterectomy.
Domanin M; Bissacco D; Le Van D; Vergara C
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 67(3):887-897. PubMed ID: 29246640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of hemodynamics in human carotid artery using ultrasound and computational fluid dynamics.
Starmans-Kool MJ; Stanton AV; Zhao S; Xu XY; Thom SA; Hughes AD
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2002 Mar; 92(3):957-61. PubMed ID: 11842026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational study of the hemodynamic impact of open- versus closed-cell stent design in carotid artery stenting.
De Santis G; Trachet B; Conti M; De Beule M; Morbiducci U; Mortier P; Segers P; Verdonck P; Verhegghe B
Artif Organs; 2013 Jul; 37(7):E96-106. PubMed ID: 23578331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of estimation methods for computational fluid dynamics outflow boundary conditions using patient-specific carotid artery.
Lee CJ; Uemiya N; Ishihara S; Zhang Y; Qian Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 23636745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]