317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640603)
1. Peer review--why and how to do it.
Jackson SA
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
Nadzam DM
Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The evaluation-notation].
Mizrahi MR
Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Logjam in the regions.
Tattam A
Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
Grose LG
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
Beck S
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Making performance appraisal work.
Noble JE
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Every which way you lose.
Snell J
Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review.
Micheli AJ; Modest S
Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 30(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 7777403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review in performance appraisal.
Mann LM; Barton CF; Presti MT; Hirsch JE
Nurs Adm Q; 1990; 14(4):9-14. PubMed ID: 2385384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring and validating a nurse's caring performance.
Smith LS
Adv Clin Care; 1990; 5(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2328068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
Fosbinder D; Vos H
J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using performance appraisal to shape the nursing division.
Hutelmyer CM
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 2640606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The annual human resource review (a career-planning system).
Vosburgh RM
Pers J; 1980 Oct; 59(10):830-7. PubMed ID: 10248748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The objectives of performance appraisal--or "where can we go from here"?
Lawler TG
Nurs Manage; 1988 Mar; 19(3):82-4, 86, 88. PubMed ID: 3347409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A peer review program for professional nurses.
Cohen B; Berube R; Turrentine B
J Nurs Staff Dev; 1996; 12(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 8699271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance skill evaluations for i.v. nurses.
Czapracki DM
J Intraven Nurs; 1989; 12(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 2723873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
Martin V
Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
