These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640603)

  • 41. Performance evaluations.
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A better way to evaluate job performance.
    Thomas DO
    RN; 1987 Jul; 50(7):15-6. PubMed ID: 3648915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing the job performance of nursing home staff.
    Sheridan JE; Fairchild TJ; Kaas M
    Nurs Res; 1983; 32(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6551761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Working with people. Evaluation of the clinical nurse specialist.
    Malone BL
    Am J Nurs; 1986 Dec; 86(12):1375-7. PubMed ID: 3641534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Taking the fear out of peer review.
    Parks J; Lindstrom CW
    Nurs Manage; 1995 Mar; 26(3):48N, 48P. PubMed ID: 7746577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The manager's challenge.
    Alexander GR
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 2640600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Developing behaviorally anchored scales for rating dietitians' performance.
    Fruin MF; Campbell JP
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1977 Aug; 71(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 881528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rating managers' performance.
    Noll HE
    Multis; 1983 Mar; 1(1):34, 38-41. PubMed ID: 10258842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Creating a clinical practice development model.
    Haag-Heitman B; Kramer A
    Am J Nurs; 1998 Aug; 98(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 9711148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of staff appraisal systems.
    de la Cour J
    Br J Nurs; 1992 May 14-27; 1(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 1617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Evaluation of charge nurses].
    Nowomińska A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of peer performance-evaluation on job satisfaction.
    Milewski R; McKercher PL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jul; 40(7):1202-5. PubMed ID: 6881160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A guide to peer appraisal.
    Walker H; Joines M
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Apr; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 15119087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.