186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2640605)
1. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review--why and how to do it.
Jackson SA
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
Nadzam DM
Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
Beck S
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A performance appraisal tool for nurse practitioners.
Levitt MK; Stern NB; Becker KL; Zaiken H; Hangasky S; Wilcox PM
Nurse Pract; 1985 Aug; 10(8):28-9, 32-3. PubMed ID: 4047527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
Grose LG
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost accountability and clinical nurse specialist evaluation.
Tierney MJ; Grant LM; Mazique SI
Nurs Manage; 1990 May; 21(5):26-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 2110640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The Professorial Promotions Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Johns Hopkins: a letter of experience].
McHugh PR
Med Clin (Barc); 1994 Feb; 102(7):259-66. PubMed ID: 8170214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
Metzger NJ
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
Sudela KD; Landureth L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
Nauright L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a peer review process among interns at an Australian hospital.
Mathews PW; Owen C; Ramsey W; Corrigan G; Bassett M; Wenzel J
Aust Health Rev; 2010 Nov; 34(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 21108913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making the performance assessment process work for you.
Lombardi DN
Adm Radiol; 1988 Apr; 7(4):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10287386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Managing performance with peer appraisal.
Fernsebner B
OR Manager; 1992 Jan; 8(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10116043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An employee performance appraisal program.
van Dassen D
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Dec; 56(12):36-9. PubMed ID: 510827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Worker assessment in practice].
Ksykiewicz-Dorota A; Drygała M
Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (7):12-4, 22. PubMed ID: 6557572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Work evaluations: are they effective?
Loraine K
Nurs Manage; 1982 Apr; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 6922444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluations.
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making your performance evaluation a 10! Prescriptions for the chief executive officer.
Crowder DM
Healthc Exec; 1989; 4(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 10304109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The application of assessment techniques.
Fink CA
Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 3368150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
