These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26406073)

  • 1. Temporal integration reflected by frequency following response in auditory brainstem.
    Xu Q; Ye D
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S767-78. PubMed ID: 26406073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between brainstem, cortical and behavioral measures relevant to pitch salience in humans.
    Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Smalt CJ; Ananthakrishnan S; Gandour JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Oct; 50(12):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 22940428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Brain Lang; 2017 Jun; 169():22-27. PubMed ID: 28237533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.
    Swaminathan J; Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Xu Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 18232372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses.
    Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):936-50. PubMed ID: 12597187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal integration affects intensity change detection in human auditory cortex.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2010 Dec; 21(18):1157-61. PubMed ID: 20938362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():61-71. PubMed ID: 30921642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
    Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Age and features of cortical auditory evoked potentials].
    Novikova LA; Rybalko NV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1982; 32(6):1132-9. PubMed ID: 7164578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an optimal paradigm for simultaneously recording cortical and brainstem auditory evoked potentials.
    Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():94-100. PubMed ID: 25561397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ON and OFF components of the auditory brainstem response have different frequency- and intensity-specific properties.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 4044424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human auditory cortical responses to pitch and to pitch strength.
    Barker D; Plack CJ; Hall DA
    Neuroreport; 2011 Feb; 22(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 21178644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.
    Yamamoto T; Uemura T; Llinás R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 1604979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness and auditory brain stem evoked response.
    Darling RM; Price LL
    Ear Hear; 1990 Aug; 11(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 2210103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical evoked potentials in response to brief modulation of signal amplitude. Experiments on auditory temporal resolution.
    von Wedel H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 7115196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.