105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26406398)
1. Constructing Time-Resolved Species Sensitivity Distributions Using a Hierarchical Toxico-Dynamic Model.
Kon Kam King G; Delignette-Muller ML; Kefford BJ; Piscart C; Charles S
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12465-73. PubMed ID: 26406398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hierarchical modelling of species sensitivity distribution: development and application to the case of diatoms exposed to several herbicides.
Kon Kam King G; Larras F; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Apr; 114():212-21. PubMed ID: 25656423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Species sensitivity distribution for pentachlorophenol to aquatic organisms based on interval ecotoxicological data.
Zhao J; Zhang R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():193-199. PubMed ID: 28734222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.
Aldenberg T; Rorije E
Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
Fox DR; Billoir E
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to account for the uncertainty from standard toxicity tests in species sensitivity distributions: An example in non-target plants.
Charles S; Wu D; Ducrot V
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245071. PubMed ID: 33411834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling Macroinvertebrate Community Dynamics in Stream Mesocosms Contaminated with a Pesticide.
Kattwinkel M; Reichert P; Rüegg J; Liess M; Schuwirth N
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(6):3165-73. PubMed ID: 26861997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making species salinity sensitivity distributions reflective of naturally occurring communities: using rapid testing and Bayesian statistics.
Hickey GL; Kefford BJ; Dunlop JE; Craig PS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Nov; 27(11):2403-11. PubMed ID: 18522453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species sensitivity distribution evaluation for chronic nickel toxicity to marine organisms.
DeForest DK; Schlekat CE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 23553986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MOSAIC_SSD: a new web tool for species sensitivity distribution to include censored data by maximum likelihood.
Kon Kam King G; Veber P; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Sep; 33(9):2133-9. PubMed ID: 24863265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.
Obiakor MO; Tighe M; Wang Z; Ezeonyejiaku CD; Pereg L; Wilson SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25276-25290. PubMed ID: 28929352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical issues in using the common mixture toxicity models concentration addition or response addition on species sensitivity distributions: a theoretical approach.
Gregorio V; Chèvre N; Junghans M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Oct; 32(10):2387-95. PubMed ID: 23804417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection bias correction for species sensitivity distribution modeling and hazardous concentration estimation.
Fox DR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2555-63. PubMed ID: 26053359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
