These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26408433)

  • 1. The Process of Breast Augmentation with Special Focus on Patient Education, Patient Selection and Implant Selection.
    Adams WP; Small KH
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):413-26. PubMed ID: 26408433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients.
    Adams WP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 19050543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast augmentation.
    Adams WP; Mallucci P
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):597e-611e. PubMed ID: 23018721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The High Five Process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation.
    Adams WP
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2007; 27(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 18165727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):293-305; discussion 306-7. PubMed ID: 11786828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Four-dimensional breast imaging, part II: clinical implementation and validation of a computer imaging system for breast augmentation planning.
    Creasman CN; Mordaunt D; Liolios T; Chiu C; Gabriel A; Maxwell GP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Nov; 31(8):925-38. PubMed ID: 22065882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Optimization of primary aesthetic breast augmentation using implants: an evidence-based level approach].
    Elfakir H; Shipkov H; Mojallal A
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2014 Apr; 59(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 24525283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolving practices in augmentation operative technique with Sientra HSC round implants.
    Calobrace MB; Kaufman DL; Gordon AE; Reid DL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(1 Suppl):57S-67S. PubMed ID: 25057751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The adjustable saline augmentation mammaplasty.
    Springer R
    Plast Surg Nurs; 1999; 19(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 10478126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary augmentation-mastopexy: indications, preferred practices, and the treatment of complications.
    Spring MA; Macias LH; Nadeau M; Stevens WG
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Sep; 34(7):1018-40. PubMed ID: 25168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation.
    Jewell ML; Jewell JL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 20442075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast augmentation.
    Hidalgo DA; Spector JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):567e-583e. PubMed ID: 24675209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient evaluation, operative planning, and surgical techniques to increase control and reduce morbidity and reoperations in breast augmentation.
    Tebbetts JB
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 28(3):501-21. PubMed ID: 11471957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision and management algorithms to address patient and food and drug administration concerns regarding breast augmentation and implants.
    Adams WP; Bengston BP; Glicksman CA; Gryskiewicz JM; Jewell ML; McGrath MH; Reisman NR; Teitelbaum SA; Tebbetts JB; Tebbetts T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1252-7. PubMed ID: 15457045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast augmentation 101: understanding cosmetic augmentation mammaplasty.
    Gladfelter J
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2007; 27(3):136-45. PubMed ID: 17901823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natrelle Style 510 in breast augmentation surgery.
    De Vita R; Buccheri EM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 23084647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.