82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26408742)
1. Relative Uptake Factor of Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer in Breast-specific Gamma Imaging as a Surrogate Parameter for Sub-typing.
Meissnitzer T; Meissnitzer MW; Seymer A; Hergan K; Neureiter D
Anticancer Res; 2015 Oct; 35(10):5671-7. PubMed ID: 26408742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Brem RF; Floerke AC; Rapelyea JA; Teal C; Kelly T; Mathur V
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 18487533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of semi-quantitative tumor uptake on Tc-99m sestamibi breast-specific gamma imaging in invasive ductal breast cancer.
Yoon HJ; Kim Y; Chang KT; Kim BS
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 29(7):553-60. PubMed ID: 25939640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of high-nuclear-grade breast cancer in Thailand: subclassification and correlation with prognostic factors and immunohistochemical study.
Chaiwun B; Nakrungsee S; Sukhamwang N; Srisukho S
Breast Cancer; 2010; 17(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19789946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast-specific gamma imaging: correlations with mammographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer.
Park JY; Yi SY; Park HJ; Kim MS; Kwon HJ; Park NH; Moon SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 24951219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrinsic subtypes and tumor grades in breast cancer are associated with distinct 3-D power Doppler sonographic vascular features.
Chang YC; Huang YS; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 24932848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Hogan MP; Goldman DA; Dashevsky B; Riedl CC; Gönen M; Osborne JR; Jochelson M; Hudis C; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1674-80. PubMed ID: 26294295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of molecular classification of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Muñoz M; Fernández-Aceñero MJ; Martín S; Schneider J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19082617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased breast density correlates with the proliferation-seeking radiotracer (99m)Tc(V)-DMSA uptake in florid epithelial hyperplasia and in mixed ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive ductal carcinoma but not in pure invasive ductal carcinoma or in mild epithelial hyperplasia.
Papantoniou V; Valsamaki P; Sotiropoulou E; Tsaroucha A; Tsiouris S; Sotiropoulou M; Marinopoulos S; Kounadi E; Karianos T; Fothiadaki A; Archontaki A; Syrgiannis K; Ptohis N; Makris N; Limouris G; Antsaklis A
Mol Imaging; 2011 Oct; 10(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 21521552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic features are associated with clinicopathological characteristics in invasive breast cancer.
Jiang L; Ma T; Moran MS; Kong X; Li X; Haffty BG; Yang Q
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2327-34. PubMed ID: 21737659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Significance of Transverse Relaxation Rate (R2*) in Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer.
Choi HY; Ko ES; Han BK; Kim EJ; Kim SM; Lim Y; Kim RB
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158500. PubMed ID: 27384310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the TNM staging system for breast cancer still relevant in the era of biomarkers and emerging personalized medicine for breast cancer - an institution's 10-year experience.
Orucevic A; Chen J; McLoughlin JM; Heidel RE; Panella T; Bell J
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25600504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variations in tumor marker levels in metastatic breast cancer patients according to tumor subtypes.
Kos T; Aksoy S; Sendur MA; Arik Z; Civelek B; Kandemir N; Ozdemir NY; Zengin N; Altundag K
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):608-13. PubMed ID: 24065471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast-specific gamma imaging in the detection of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular neoplasia.
Ling CM; Coffey CM; Rapelyea JA; Torrente J; Teal CB; McSwain AP; Brem RF
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 22578225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast-specific gamma imaging for detection of breast cancer.
Riordan W
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):306; author reply 306. PubMed ID: 19332861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. E-cadherin status in breast cancer correlates with histologic type but does not correlate with established prognostic parameters.
Qureshi HS; Linden MD; Divine G; Raju UB
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 125(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 16613340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI versus breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in newly diagnosed ductal cell carcinoma-in-situ: a prospective head-to-head trial.
Keto JL; Kirstein L; Sanchez DP; Fulop T; McPartland L; Cohen I; Boolbol SK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 21739318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
