These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409245)

  • 1. Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation.
    Donati F; Figueroa CA; Smith NP; Lamata P; Nordsletten DA
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Dec; 26(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 26409245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.
    Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.
    Goubergrits L; Riesenkampff E; Yevtushenko P; Schaller J; Kertzscher U; Hennemuth A; Berger F; Schubert S; Kuehne T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 24723299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Lamata P; Pitcher A; Krittian S; Nordsletten D; Bissell MM; Cassar T; Barker AJ; Markl M; Neubauer S; Smith NP
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):1162-9. PubMed ID: 24243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study.
    Mirzaee H; Henn T; Krause MJ; Goubergrits L; Schumann C; Neugebauer M; Kuehne T; Preusser T; Hennemuth A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 27384018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of pressure drop assessment using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of aortic stenoses.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):893-906. PubMed ID: 30252155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations.
    Saitta S; Pirola S; Piatti F; Votta E; Lucherini F; Pluchinotta F; Carminati M; Lombardi M; Geppert C; Cuomo F; Figueroa CA; Xu XY; Redaelli A
    J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():13-21. PubMed ID: 31326119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; van Bavel E; Nederveen AJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Sep; 34(9):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23598829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A finite-element approach to the direct computation of relative cardiovascular pressure from time-resolved MR velocity data.
    Krittian SB; Lamata P; Michler C; Nordsletten DA; Bock J; Bradley CP; Pitcher A; Kilner PJ; Markl M; Smith NP
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):1029-37. PubMed ID: 22626833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Convex gradient optimization for increased spatiotemporal resolution and improved accuracy in phase contrast MRI.
    Middione MJ; Wu HH; Ennis DB
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1552-64. PubMed ID: 24347040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization.
    Bock J; Frydrychowicz A; Stalder AF; Bley TA; Burkhardt H; Hennig J; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Feb; 63(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 20024953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simplified Bernoulli's method significantly underestimates pulmonary transvalvular pressure drop.
    Falahatpisheh A; Rickers C; Gabbert D; Heng EL; Stalder A; Kramer HH; Kilner PJ; Kheradvar A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 26584006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 4D Flow MRI-based pressure loss estimation in stenotic flows: Evaluation using numerical simulations.
    Casas B; Lantz J; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1808-21. PubMed ID: 26016805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements.
    Wentland AL; Grist TM; Wieben O
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 23510798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
    Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 19967532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.
    Beier S; Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Cater JE; Norris SE; Medrano-Gracia P; Young AA; Cowan BR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 27042817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation.
    Frydrychowicz A; Wieben O; Niespodzany E; Reeder SB; Johnson KM; François CJ
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):819-25. PubMed ID: 23857136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of turbulent flow effects on the vessel wall using four-dimensional flow MRI.
    Ziegler M; Lantz J; Ebbers T; Dyverfeldt P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jun; 77(6):2310-2319. PubMed ID: 27350049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T.
    Strecker C; Harloff A; Wallis W; Markl M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1097-103. PubMed ID: 22745007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.