These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409397)

  • 1. An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults.
    Mitchell D; Hancock E; Alexander L
    Work; 2015; 53(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 26409397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.
    James C; Mackenzie L; Capra M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(19-20):1797-804. PubMed ID: 21244335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro's functional capacity evaluation.
    Scheel C; Mecham J; Zuccarello V; Mattes R
    Work; 2018; 60(3):465-473. PubMed ID: 30040785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
    Trippolini MA; Dijkstra PU; Jansen B; Oesch P; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
    J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 24(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 23975060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health professional's perceptions and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations: results of a quantitative survey.
    James C; Mackenzie L
    J Occup Rehabil; 2009 Jun; 19(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 19365617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.
    Reneman MF; Jaegers SM; Westmaas M; Göeken LN
    Work; 2002; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12441588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reproducibility of two task-specific functional capacity evaluation protocols for household waste collectors.
    Gouttebarge V; Plat MC; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 24763346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.
    Bieniek S; Bethge M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Mar; 15():106. PubMed ID: 24674029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do wearable fitness devices correlate with performance-based tests of work-related functional capacity?
    Karpman J; Gross DP; Manns P; Tomkins-Lane C
    Work; 2020; 66(1):201-211. PubMed ID: 32417827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults.
    Soer R; Gerrits EH; Reneman MF
    Work; 2006; 26(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 16720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review.
    De Baets S; Calders P; Schalley N; Vermeulen K; Vertriest S; Van Peteghem L; Coussens M; Malfait F; Vanderstraeten G; Van Hove G; Van de Velde D
    J Occup Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 28(3):418-428. PubMed ID: 28988355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound measurement of transversus abdominis during loaded, functional tasks in asymptomatic individuals: rater reliability.
    Watson T; McPherson S; Fleeman S
    PM R; 2011 Aug; 3(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 21741891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of kinesiologists' functional capacity evaluation practice in Canada.
    Sinden KE; McGillivary TL; Chapman E; Fischer SL
    Work; 2017; 56(4):571-580. PubMed ID: 28339418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation.
    Reneman MF; Dijkstra PU; Westmaas M; Göeken LN
    J Occup Rehabil; 2002 Dec; 12(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 12389478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation.
    Gross DP; Battié MC
    Phys Ther; 2002 Apr; 82(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 11922852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2354-60. PubMed ID: 16344035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery.
    Lou X; Lee R; Feins RH; Enter D; Hicks GL; Verrier ED; Fann JI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2491-6.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25308119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry.
    Gouttebarge V; Kuijer PP; Wind H; van Duivenbooden C; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):657-63. PubMed ID: 19468014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting.
    James CL; Reneman MF; Gross DP
    J Occup Rehabil; 2016 Mar; 26(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 26108156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in construction workers on sick leave as a result of musculoskeletal disorders.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 90(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 19236984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.