These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409492)

  • 1. Pediatric validity assessment.
    Kirkwood MW
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2015; 36(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 26409492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncredible effort during pediatric neuropsychological exam: a case series and literature review.
    Kirkwood MW; Kirk JW; Blaha RZ; Wilson P
    Child Neuropsychol; 2010; 16(6):604-18. PubMed ID: 20628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The implications of symptom validity test failure for ability-based test performance in a pediatric sample.
    Kirkwood MW; Yeates KO; Randolph C; Kirk JW
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 21767023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of the WISC-IV Digit Span subtest in detecting noncredible performance during pediatric neuropsychological examinations.
    Kirkwood MW; Hargrave DD; Kirk JW
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Aug; 26(5):377-84. PubMed ID: 21602179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of an attention-based performance validity test for the detection of feigned cognitive dysfunction after acquired brain injury.
    Fuermaier ABM; Tucha O; Russ D; Ehrenstein JK; Stanke M; Heindorf R; Buggenthin R; Aschenbrenner S; Koerts J; Tucha L
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 42(3):285-297. PubMed ID: 32041477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embedded performance validity indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test, Children's Version.
    Baker DA; Connery AK; Kirk JW; Kirkwood MW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 24229006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical guidelines in the use of symptom validity and other psychological tests to measure malingering and symptom exaggeration in traumatic brain injury cases.
    Etcoff LM; Kampfer KM
    Neuropsychol Rev; 1996 Dec; 6(4):171-201. PubMed ID: 9159771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noncredible cognitive performance in the context of severe brain injury.
    Boone KB; Lu P
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 May; 17(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 13680432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of performance and symptom validity testing with pediatric populations.
    Kirk JW; Baker DA; Kirk JJ; MacAllister WS
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2020; 9(4):292-306. PubMed ID: 32372667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering in children with neurological conditions.
    Ploetz DM; Mazur-Mosiewicz A; Kirkwood MW; Sherman EM; Brooks BL
    Child Neuropsychol; 2016; 22(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 25495184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The base rate of suboptimal effort in a pediatric mild TBI sample: performance on the Medical Symptom Validity Test.
    Kirkwood MW; Kirk JW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2010; 24(5):860-72. PubMed ID: 20182954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apparent effect of type of compensation seeking (disability versus litigation) on performance validity test scores may be due to other factors.
    Cottingham ME; Victor TL; Boone KB; Ziegler EA; Zeller M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(6):1030-47. PubMed ID: 25157537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
    Tan JE; Slick DJ; Strauss E; Hultsch DF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 12822058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment.
    Rüsseler J; Brett A; Klaue U; Sailer M; Münte TF
    BMC Neurol; 2008 Oct; 8():37. PubMed ID: 18838010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
    Jelicic M; Ceunen E; Peters MJ; Merckelbach H
    J Clin Psychol; 2011 Sep; 67(9):850-5. PubMed ID: 21503898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of pediatric neuropsychological consultation in mild traumatic brain injury: a model for providing feedback after invalid performance.
    Connery AK; Peterson RL; Baker DA; Kirkwood MW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 May; 30(4):579-98. PubMed ID: 27142647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between the self-report BASC-2 validity indicators and performance validity test failure after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
    Kirk JW; Hutaff-Lee CF; Connery AK; Baker DA; Kirkwood MW
    Assessment; 2014 Oct; 21(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 24532649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting performance invalidity in children: not quite as easy as A, B, C, 1, 2, 3 but automatized sequences appears promising.
    Kirkwood MW; Connery AK; Kirk JW; Baker DA
    Child Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 20(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 23297668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suspect cognitive symptoms in a 9-year-old child: malingering by proxy?
    Lu PH; Boone KB
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 11992231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.