132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409521)
1. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms.
Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.
Mazurowski MA; Lo JY; Harrawood BP; Tourassi GD
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 21554985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD.
Mayo RC; Kent D; Sen LC; Kapoor M; Leung JWT; Watanabe AT
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 30963339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency.
Polakowski WE; Cournoyer DA; Rogers SK; DeSimio MP; Ruck DW; Hoffmeister JW; Raines RA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 9533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system.
Al-Masni MA; Al-Antari MA; Park JM; Gi G; Kim TY; Rivera P; Valarezo E; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():85-94. PubMed ID: 29477437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Nov; 2(11):959-66. PubMed ID: 9419667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection.
Melendez J; Sánchez CI; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081904. PubMed ID: 25086535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification.
Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Sep; 117():44-54. PubMed ID: 30032964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel computer aided breast mass detection scheme based on morphological enhancement and SLIC superpixel segmentation.
Chu J; Min H; Liu L; Lu W
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3859-69. PubMed ID: 26133587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An approach to the detection of lesions in mammograms using fuzzy image processing.
Bayram B; Acar U
J Int Med Res; 2007; 35(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 18034992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
