These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409603)

  • 1. Comparison Costs of ERCP and MRCP in Patients with Suspected Biliary Obstruction Based on a Randomized Trial.
    Adam V; Bhat M; Martel M; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Barkun JS; Barkun AN
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 26409603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Meagher S; Yusoff I; Kennedy W; Martel M; Adam V; Barkun A
    Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised clinical trial: MRCP-first vs. ERCP-first approach in patients with suspected biliary obstruction due to bile duct stones.
    Bhat M; Romagnuolo J; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Martel M; Barkun JS; Barkun AN
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2013 Nov; 38(9):1045-53. PubMed ID: 24024705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies.
    Howard K; Lord SJ; Speer A; Gibson RN; Padbury R; Kearney B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16673687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.
    Romagnuolo J; Currie G;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
    Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
    Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
    Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
    Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging.
    Ang TL; Teo EK; Fock KM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Oct; 26(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17894658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
    Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
    Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
    Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
    Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of ERCP and MRCP: invasiveness and cost].
    Fukushima T; Yamada R; Koba R; Asakura T; Osanai S; Imamura K; Nakajima Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 64(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 15148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
    Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
    Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
    Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of inoperable hilar biliary obstruction.
    Harewood GC; Baron TH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 May; 97(5):1152-8. PubMed ID: 12014720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-minimization analysis of MRC versus ERCP for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Talwalkar JA; Angulo P; Johnson CD; Petersen BT; Lindor KD
    Hepatology; 2004 Jul; 40(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15239084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.