These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409620)

  • 1. What Guidance are Economists Given on How to Present Economic Evaluations for Policymakers? A Systematic Review.
    Sullivan SM; Wells G; Coyle D
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):915-24. PubMed ID: 26409620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review.
    Sullivan SM; Coyle D; Wells G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113277. PubMed ID: 25517510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
    Mauskopf JA; Sullivan SD; Annemans L; Caro J; Mullins CD; Nuijten M; Orlewska E; Watkins J; Trueman P
    Value Health; 2007; 10(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 17888098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review.
    Hildon Z; Allwood D; Black N
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Feb; 24(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities.
    Hoffmann C; Stoykova BA; Nixon J; Glanville JM; Misso K; Drummond MF
    Value Health; 2002; 5(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11918822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers.
    Cronin P; Rawson JV
    Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):537-58. PubMed ID: 26928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for reporting health economic research.
    Haddad FS; McLawhorn AS
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Feb; 98-B(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26850417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 30761762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where are the economic guidelines coming from?
    McGuire A; Morris S; Raikou M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(4):976-86. PubMed ID: 11155846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1049. PubMed ID: 23529982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 23587340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluation studies of injury prevention.
    Polinder S; Segui-Gomez M; Toet H; Belt E; Sethi D; Racioppi F; van Beeck EF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():211-21. PubMed ID: 22269503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introducing economic evaluation as a policy tool in Korea: will decision makers get quality information? : a critical review of published Korean economic evaluations.
    Lee KS; Brouwer WB; Lee SI; Koo HW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(7):709-21. PubMed ID: 15987227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presentation of economic evaluation results.
    Chaikledkaew U; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective presentation of health care performance information for consumer decision making: A systematic review.
    Kurtzman ET; Greene J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 26277826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic Review of Health Economic Impact Evaluations of Risk Prediction Models: Stop Developing, Start Evaluating.
    van Giessen A; Peters J; Wilcher B; Hyde C; Moons C; de Wit A; Koffijberg E
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 28408017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.