These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26409946)

  • 1. Audiometric studies versus predictions of drastic deteriorations of hearing protectors' noise attenuation due to reduced wearing time: Misjudgments by standards based on the energy-equivalence principle.
    Strasser H; Müller O; Irle H
    Work; 2015; 51(4):757-70. PubMed ID: 26409946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporary hearing threshold shifts and restitution after energy-equivalent exposures to industrial noise and classical music.
    Strasser H; Irle H; Legler R
    Noise Health; 2003; 5(20):75-84. PubMed ID: 14558895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):297-311. PubMed ID: 6826899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
    Pawlas K; Grzesik J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tikka C; Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Ferrite S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006396. PubMed ID: 28685503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of noise exposure during solitary trumpet playing: immediate impact on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and long-term implications for hearing.
    Poissant SF; Freyman RL; MacDonald AJ; Nunes HA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 22531575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing protector performance--an update.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 7405821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
    Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 4059854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of wearing time on hearing protector attenuation.
    Abel SM; Rokas D
    J Otolaryngol; 1986 Oct; 15(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 3773044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.