124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26410507)
1. Computer-aided King classification of scoliosis.
Zhang J; Li H; Lv L; Shi X; Zhang Y
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S411-7. PubMed ID: 26410507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized Lenke classification of scoliotic spine.
Zhang J; Shi X; Lv L; Wang X; Zhang Y; Guo F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():945-8. PubMed ID: 24109845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Duong L; Cheriet F; Labelle H; Cheung KM; Abel MF; Newton PO; McCall RE; Lenke LG; Stokes IA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 19652574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Computer-aided Method for Improving the Reliability of Lenke Classification for Scoliosis.
Zhang J; Li H; Lv L; Shi X; Guo F; Zhang Y
J Healthc Eng; 2015; 6(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 26288884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis].
Sheng WB; Zheng XF; Guo HL; Zhan YL; Mai ED; Jin GL; Pu LT; Sheng J; Deng Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 89(15):1047-52. PubMed ID: 19595255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of computer-aided approaches to the PUMC classification of scoliosis.
Zhang J; Li H; Zhang Y
Biomed Eng Lett; 2017 Aug; 7(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 30603172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system.
Ogon M; Giesinger K; Behensky H; Wimmer C; Nogler M; Bach CM; Krismer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):858-62. PubMed ID: 11935109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.
Lenke LG; Betz RR; Harms J; Bridwell KH; Clements DH; Lowe TG; Blanke K
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Aug; 83(8):1169-81. PubMed ID: 11507125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Cummings RJ; Loveless EA; Campbell J; Samelson S; Mazur JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Aug; 80(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9730119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rule-based algorithm for automated King-type classification of idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():149-52. PubMed ID: 15456021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.
Cheung J; Wever DJ; Veldhuizen AG; Klein JP; Verdonck B; Nijlunsing R; Cool JC; Van Horn JR
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 12522710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Lenke LG; Betz RR; Bridwell KH; Clements DH; Harms J; Lowe TG; Shufflebarger HL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Aug; 80(8):1097-106. PubMed ID: 9730118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
