These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Angiographically minimal but functionally significant coronary lesion confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Nam CW; Kim KB; Hur SH Korean J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 31(4):807-8. PubMed ID: 27320616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of left main artery stenosis with fractional flow reserve is affected by downstream stenosis in the left anterior descending artery. Bing R; Yong AS; Fearon WF Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e35-7. PubMed ID: 26247268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational fluid dynamics: can computed tomography imaging compete with cath-lab physiology? Marwan M Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Mar; 115(4):e41-e43. PubMed ID: 30907416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Focused update of expert consensus statement: Use of invasive assessments of coronary physiology and structure: A position statement of the society of cardiac angiography and interventions. Lotfi A; Davies JE; Fearon WF; Grines CL; Kern MJ; Klein LW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 29968425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective radiation doses associated with non-invasive versus invasive assessment of coronary anatomy and physiology. Toth GG; Ntalianis A; Ntarladimas Y; de Booij M; De Winter O; Barbato E; Pilet B; Van Mieghem C; Wijns W; De Bruyne B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1173-81. PubMed ID: 25381869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incremental diagnostic value of epicardial adipose tissue for the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery disease. Romijn MA; Danad I; Bakkum MJ; Stuijfzand WJ; Tulevski II; Somsen GA; Lammertsma AA; van Kuijk C; van de Ven PM; Min JK; Leipsic J; van Rossum AC; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P Atherosclerosis; 2015 Sep; 242(1):161-6. PubMed ID: 26188540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On tests, times, and the test of time.. Achenbach S; Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1187-9. PubMed ID: 23153924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. First Presentation of Integration of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography and Computational Fractional Flow Reserve. Tian F; Yu W; Huang J; Zhang T; Chen Y; Tu S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):601-602. PubMed ID: 30390169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The present day potential role of fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Casselman F; Van der Merwe J; Ferrara A; Barbato E J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):926-32. PubMed ID: 26806476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of fractional flow reserve in different anatomical subsets. Lau JK; Yong AS Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e2-7. PubMed ID: 26247266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel approach for fractional flow reserve derivation from coronary computed tomographic angiography. Renker M; Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Spearman JV; Baumann S Coron Artery Dis; 2015 May; 26(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 25493661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The one-stop shop offering both coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: may well be opening soon, around the corner. Wijns W JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1112-4. PubMed ID: 23153910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]