178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26411313)
21. Developments and controversies in coronary physiology and imaging.
Ng MK; Barlis P
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e1. PubMed ID: 26247264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits.
Johnson NP; Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):817-32. PubMed ID: 24046379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve?
De Maria GL; Garcia-Garcia HM; Scarsini R; Hideo-Kajita A; Gonzalo López N; Leone AM; Sarno G; Daemen J; Shlofmitz E; Jeremias A; Tebaldi M; Bezerra HG; Tu S; Lemos PA; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Collet C; Banning AP; Barbato E; Johnson NP; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 13(4):e008487. PubMed ID: 32295416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Using Coronary Angiographic Vessel Morphology Versus Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve.
Tröbs M; Achenbach S; Röther J; Redel T; Scheuering M; Winneberger D; Klingenbeck K; Itu L; Passerini T; Kamen A; Sharma P; Comaniciu D; Schlundt C
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 117(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 26596195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers.
Kern MJ; Seto AH
Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(24):2295-2297. PubMed ID: 29229617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Advances in three-dimensional coronary imaging and computational fluid dynamics: is virtual fractional flow reserve more than just a pretty picture?
Poon EK; Hayat U; Thondapu V; Ooi AS; Ul Haq MA; Moore S; Foin N; Tu S; Chin C; Monty JP; Marusic I; Barlis P
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e43-54. PubMed ID: 26247271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia.
Wang R; Baumann S; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Rier JD; Morris JZ; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Steinberg DH; Renker M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 26344482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virtual fractional flow reserve derived from invasive coronary angiography.
Fan G; Qi X; Yang C; Fu Q
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 84(2):E16-7. PubMed ID: 24273209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Compared With Catheter-Based Dobutamine-Stress Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With a Myocardial Bridge and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
Jubran A; Schnittger I; Tremmel J; Pargaonkar V; Rogers I; Becker HC; Yang S; Mastrodicasa D; Willemink M; Fleischmann D; Nieman K
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e009576. PubMed ID: 32069114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Variations in coronary lumen dimensions measured in vivo.
Puri R; Nelson AJ; Liew GY; Nicholls SJ; Carbone A; Wong DT; Harvey JE; Uno K; Copus B; Leong DP; Beltrame JF; Worthley SG; Worthley MI
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 22239902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.
Onuma Y; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Webster M; Nieman K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24156961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health.
Schindler TH; Schelbert HR; Quercioli A; Dilsizian V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):623-40. PubMed ID: 20541718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Invasive coronary physiology for assessing intermediate lesions.
Fearon WF
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001942. PubMed ID: 25657316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel Method for Real-Time Coregistration of Coronary Physiology and Angiography by iFR.
Frimerman A; Abu-Fane R; Levi Y; Meisel S; Marcusohn E; Solomonica A; Roguin A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):692-694. PubMed ID: 30947947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. President's page: prospective and retrospective preeminence: what is right about coronary CT.
Ziffer JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 20579623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
