These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26411645)

  • 1. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: Adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization.
    Frankenberger R; Zeilinger I; Krech M; Mörig G; Naumann M; Braun A; Krämer N; Roggendorf MJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Nov; 31(11):1312-20. PubMed ID: 26411645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite.
    Frankenberger R; Winter J; Dudek MC; Naumann M; Amend S; Braun A; Krämer N; Roggendorf MJ
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 34947327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
    Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations.
    van den Breemer CRG; Özcan M; Cune MS; van der Giezen R; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt MMM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 72():102-109. PubMed ID: 28477520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars.
    Bianchi E Silva AA; Ghiggi PC; Mota EG; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
    Stomatologija; 2013; 15(4):123-8. PubMed ID: 24589635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of non-invasively reinforced MOD cavities on endodontically treated teeth.
    Daher R; Ardu S; Di Bella E; Rocca GT; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
    Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):368-375. PubMed ID: 32886263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
    Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.