249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26411752)
21. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections.
Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Otero B; Cobos P; Osuna C; Centeno Mdel M; Melchor JC; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1716-8. PubMed ID: 22339273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does routine induction of labour at 41 weeks really reduce the rate of caesarean section compared with expectant management?
Pavicic H; Hamelin K; Menticoglou SM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jul; 31(7):621-626. PubMed ID: 19761635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
Sherrard A; Platt RW; Vallerand D; Usher RH; Zhang X; Kramer MS
BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Temporal trends in stillbirth in the United States, 1992-2004: a population-based cohort study.
Zhang X; Kramer MS
BJOG; 2014 Sep; 121(10):1229-36. PubMed ID: 24861638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?
Mahomed K; Pungsornruk K; Gibbons K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 36(7):916-920. PubMed ID: 27612522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
de Castro H; Haas J; Schiff E; Sivan E; Yinon Y; Barzilay E
BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):940-5. PubMed ID: 26228895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.
Kwee A; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Reuwer PJ; Bruinse HW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16884843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes.
Wood S; Cooper S; Ross S
BJOG; 2014 May; 121(6):674-85; discussion 685. PubMed ID: 23834460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference?
Teixeira C; Correia S; Barros H
BMC Res Notes; 2013 May; 6():214. PubMed ID: 23714240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study.
Knight HE; Cromwell DA; Gurol-Urganci I; Harron K; van der Meulen JH; Smith GCS
PLoS Med; 2017 Nov; 14(11):e1002425. PubMed ID: 29136007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A contemporary approach to the obstetric management of women with heart disease.
Robertson JE; Silversides CK; Ling Mah M; Kulikowski J; Maxwell C; Wald RM; Colman JM; Siu SC; Sermer M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Sep; 34(9):812-819. PubMed ID: 22971448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prevalence and risk factors for caesarean delivery following labor induction at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study (2000-2015).
Tarimo CS; Mahande MJ; Obure J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):173. PubMed ID: 32188409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Propensity score method for analyzing the effect of labor induction in prolonged pregnancy.
Pyykönen A; Tapper AM; Gissler M; Haukka J; Petäjä J; Lehtonen L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):445-453. PubMed ID: 28832917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Labour induction policy in hospitals of different levels of specialisation.
Järvelin MR; Hartikainen-Sorri AL; Rantakallio P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Apr; 100(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 8494831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Epidural analgesia in labour and risk of caesarean delivery.
Bannister-Tyrrell M; Ford JB; Morris JM; Roberts CL
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 28(5):400-11. PubMed ID: 25040829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
