BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26411806)

  • 1. Associations Between iCOGS Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Upgrading in Both Surgical and Active Surveillance Cohorts of Men with Prostate Cancer.
    Kearns JT; Lapin B; Wang E; Roehl KA; Cooper P; Catalona WJ; Helfand BT
    Eur Urol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 26411806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Park J; Yoo S; Cho MC; Cho MH; Jeong CW; Ku JH; Kwak C; Kim HH; Jeong H
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4510149. PubMed ID: 29854755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
    Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.
    Tran GN; Leapman MS; Nguyen HG; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 27595378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
    Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
    World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
    Jain S; Loblaw A; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Kattan MW; Mamedov A; Jethava V; Sethukavalan P; Yu C; Klotz L
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25660208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
    Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
    Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
    Pham DM; Kim JK; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
    Investig Clin Urol; 2020 Jul; 61(4):405-410. PubMed ID: 32665997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
    Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathologic Outcomes in Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Men Electing Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery.
    Tosoian JJ; Sundi D; Trock BJ; Landis P; Epstein JI; Schaeffer EM; Carter HB; Mamawala M
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 26456680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Core Biopsies from Prostate Cancer Patients in Active Surveillance Protocols Harbor PTEN and MYC Alterations.
    Gandellini P; Casiraghi N; Rancati T; Benelli M; Doldi V; Romanel A; Colecchia M; Marenghi C; Valdagni R; Demichelis F; Zaffaroni N
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):277-285. PubMed ID: 31200842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
    Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple Tissue Biomarkers Independently and Additively Predict Prostate Cancer Pathology Outcomes.
    Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Lindquist KJ; Kobayashi Y; Simko JP; Bengtsson H; Singh K; Ngo V; Avila A; Newcomb LF; Tretriakova M; Lin DW; Stone S; Carroll PR; Paris PL
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jan; 79(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 33148472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.