These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26411901)
1. Modified Bi-Rads Scoring of Breast Imaging Findings Improves Clinical Judgment. Silberman H; Sheth PA; Parisky YR; Hovanessian-Larsen LJ; Sheth S; Tripathy D Breast J; 2015; 21(6):642-50. PubMed ID: 26411901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions. Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology]. Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome]. Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound. Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Baum JK; Hanna LG; Acharyya S; Mahoney MC; Conant EF; Bassett LW; Pisano ED Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiological features of breast cancer]. Kettritz U Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues. D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]