These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26412000)
1. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. Kattadiyil MT; Jekki R; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):818-25. PubMed ID: 26412000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: Clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Bidra AS; Farrell K; Burnham D; Dhingra A; Taylor TD; Kuo CL J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):578-586.e1. PubMed ID: 26794695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Conventionally Versus Digitally Fabricated Denture Outcomes in a University Dental Clinic. Clark WA; Brazile B; Matthews D; Solares J; De Kok IJ J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 33058337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction survey of mandibular two-implant-retained overdentures in a predoctoral program. Dias R; Moghadam M; Kuyinu E; Jahangiri L J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 23929368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. Allen PF; McMillan AS; Walshaw D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11208203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures. Zembic A; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 23581398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection patterns of dietary foods in edentulous participants rehabilitated with maxillary complete dentures opposed by mandibular implant-supported prostheses: a multicenter longitudinal assessment. Tajbakhsh S; Rubenstein JE; Faine MP; Mancl LA; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 24079559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Denture Fabrication in Pre- and Postdoctoral Education: A Survey of U.S. Dental Schools. Fernandez MA; Nimmo A; Behar-Horenstein LS J Prosthodont; 2016 Jan; 25(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26098406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of complete dentures by prospective implant patients. Kotkin H; Slabbert JC; Becker PJ; Carr L Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 9728118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare. Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes and costs of conventional and digital complete dentures in a university clinic: A retrospective study. Arakawa I; Al-Haj Husain N; Srinivasan M; Maniewicz S; Abou-Ayash S; Schimmel M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 33610329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in a group of Turkish patients: a quality of life study. Cakir O; Kazancioglu HO; Celik G; Deger S; Ak G J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 24417762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]