187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26412182)
1. [An improved method of electrode placement for ECG monitoring in children].
Fang H; Yang TL; Zhou H; Jiang MN; Fang F; Huang YH; Pei ZF
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 17(9):975-9. PubMed ID: 26412182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram.
Farrell RM; Syed A; Syed A; Gutterman DD
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 18790505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precordial electrode placement for optimal ECG monitoring: implications for ambulatory monitor devices and event recorders.
Nedios S; Romero I; Gerds-Li JH; Fleck E; Kriatselis C
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 24857184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction of ECG variations caused by body position changes and electrode placement during ST-T monitoring.
Nelwan SP; Meij SH; van Dam TB; Kors JA
J Electrocardiol; 2001; 34 Suppl():213-6. PubMed ID: 11781959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of p-wave patterns derived from correct and incorrect placement of V1-V2 electrodes.
García-Niebla J
J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19242281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of CIPS-computed PVC location to measurement errors in ECG electrode position: the need for the 3D camera.
van Dam PM; Gordon JP; Laks M
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25194874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified limb lead ECG system effects on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis in sinus rhythm subjects.
Jayaraman S; Sangareddi V; Periyasamy R; Joseph J; Shanmugam RM
Anatol J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 27443474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the recording condition on the quality of a single-lead electrocardiogram.
Hamada S; Sasaki K; Kito H; Tooyama Y; Ihara K; Aoyagi E; Ichimura N; Tohda S; Sasano T
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1010-1026. PubMed ID: 34854951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of limb lead electrodes location on ECG and localization of idiopathic outflow tract tachycardia: a prospective study.
Arya A; Huo Y; Frogner F; Wetzel U; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Richter S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 Aug; 22(8):886-91. PubMed ID: 21332862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of electrocardiograph frequency filters on P-QRS-T amplitudes of the feline electrocardiogram.
Schrope DP; Fox PR; Hahn AW; Bond B; Rosenthal S
Am J Vet Res; 1995 Nov; 56(11):1534-40. PubMed ID: 8585669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proximal placement of limb electrodes: a potential solution for acquiring standard electrocardiogram waveforms from monitoring electrode positions.
Pahlm O; Wagner GS
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 18805543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does modifying electrode placement of the 12 lead ECG matter in healthy subjects?
Sheppard JP; Barker TA; Ranasinghe AM; Clutton-Brock TH; Frenneaux MP; Parkes MJ
Int J Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 152(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 20701990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A standardized procedure for locating and documenting ECG chest electrode positions: consideration of the effect of breast tissue on ECG amplitudes in women.
Rautaharju PM; Park L; Rautaharju FS; Crow R
J Electrocardiol; 1998 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 9533374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wearable 3-Lead Electrocardiogram Placement Model for Fleet Sizing of Medical Devices.
Arquilla K; Leary S; Webb AK; Anderson AP
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2020 Nov; 91(11):868-875. PubMed ID: 33334407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Day-to-day variability of electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Influence of electrode placement.
Angeli F; Verdecchia P; Angeli E; Poeta F; Sardone M; Bentivoglio M; Prosciutti L; Cocchieri M; Zollino L; Bellomo G; Rondoni F; Garognoli O; Lenti S; Frigerio C; Gattobigio R; Benemio G; Biscottini B; Panciarola R; Buccolieri M; Liberati R; Trottini M; Cipollini F; Gemelli F; Schillaci G; Porcellati C
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 Nov; 7(11):812-6. PubMed ID: 17060807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Impact assessment of new sick clothes in patients with electrocardiogram monitoring].
Lin S; Lin J; Lu H; Yang M
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Mar; 31(3):355-358. PubMed ID: 30914100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of ECG electrode placement by emergency department clinicians.
McCann K; Holdgate A; Mahammad R; Waddington A
Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Oct; 19(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 17919217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Common source of miscalculation and misclassification of P-wave negativity and P-wave terminal force in lead V1.
Rasmussen MU; Fabricius-Bjerre A; Kumarathurai P; Larsen BS; Domínguez H; Kanters JK; Sajadieh A
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 53():85-88. PubMed ID: 30716527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardization of electrode placement for continuous patient monitoring: introduction of an assessment tool to compare proposed electrocardiogram lead configurations.
Drew B
J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 21216412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
