382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26412217)
1. Institutional quality assurance for breast cancer HER2 immunohistochemical testing: identification of outlier results and impact of simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization cotesting.
Green IF; Zynger DL
Hum Pathol; 2015 Dec; 46(12):1842-9. PubMed ID: 26412217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concordance of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence
Furrer D; Jacob S; Caron C; Sanschagrin F; Provencher L; Diorio C
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3323-3329. PubMed ID: 28551685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.
Muller KE; Marotti JD; Memoli VA; Wells WA; Tafe LJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Aug; 144(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 26185309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of the change in cutoff values for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study comparing conventional brightfield microscopy, image analysis-assisted microscopy, and interobserver variation.
Atkinson R; Mollerup J; Laenkholm AV; Verardo M; Hawes D; Commins D; Engvad B; Correa A; Ehlers CC; Nielsen KV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 21809992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of 2013 Updated ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study of 1739 Cases.
Zhang X; Bleiweiss I; Jaffer S; Nayak A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Oct; 17(6):486-492. PubMed ID: 28433541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
Xu FP; Wang K; Xu J; Chen J; Zhang YF; Wu HM; Zhang MH; Long XX; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Lin DY; Liu YH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 28861637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with fluorescence in situ hybridization in determining the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of breast cancer specimens: a multicenter study of 3,149 Chinese patients.
Han X; Shi Y; Ma L; Lyu Z; Yang H; Yao J; Li J; Li B; Qin Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 24438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.
Rakha EA; Pinder SE; Bartlett JM; Ibrahim M; Starczynski J; Carder PJ; Provenzano E; Hanby A; Hales S; Lee AH; Ellis IO;
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25488926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
