These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26412447)
1. Strange Data: When the Numbers Just Aren't Normal. Jupiter DC J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(6):1216-7. PubMed ID: 26412447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--2. Parametric and nonparametric analyses]. Nagata O Masui; 1996 Oct; 45(10):1235-9. PubMed ID: 8937019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests: Considerations when choosing the most appropriate option for your data. Vrbin CM Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 36017662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exact and Monte carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Berry KJ; Mielke PW Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):749-54. PubMed ID: 11153842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Do we always correctly interpret the results of statistical nonparametric tests]. Moczko JA Przegl Lek; 2014; 71(11):654-8. PubMed ID: 25799864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations. Zimmerman DW Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Rank transformations--the connection between nonparametric and parametric statistics]. Su BH; Shi BZ Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Sep; 23(5):274-8. PubMed ID: 2625061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advice on statistical analysis for Circulation Research. Kusuoka H; Hoffman JI Circ Res; 2002 Oct; 91(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 12386142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical research XVI. Differences between medians with the Mann-Whitney U test]. Rivas-Ruiz R; Moreno-Palacios J; Talavera JO Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24021070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of student's t- or Wilcoxon-based confidence intervals for assessment of average bioequivalence. Hauck WW; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Bois FY; Steinijans VW; Anderson S J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 9056597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A SAS(®) macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal-Wallis analysis. Elliott AC; Hynan LS Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Apr; 102(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21146248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On sample size of the kruskal-wallis test with application to a mouse peritoneal cavity study. Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 20345499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical trials: robust tests are wonderful for imperfect data. Cleophas TJ Am J Ther; 2015; 22(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 23896742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A nonparametric approach to the discrimination of two cell populations. Peet FG; Sahota TS Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 6359994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parametric and non-parametric tests for the overall comparison of several treatments to a control when treatment is expected to increase variability. Troendle JF; Blair RC; Rumsey D; Moke P Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(23):2729-39. PubMed ID: 9421872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality. Zimmerman DW Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]