These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26412447)

  • 1. Strange Data: When the Numbers Just Aren't Normal.
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(6):1216-7. PubMed ID: 26412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--2. Parametric and nonparametric analyses].
    Nagata O
    Masui; 1996 Oct; 45(10):1235-9. PubMed ID: 8937019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests: Considerations when choosing the most appropriate option for your data.
    Vrbin CM
    Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 36017662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Privacy-preserving Kruskal-Wallis test.
    Guo S; Zhong S; Zhang A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Oct; 112(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 23871682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 27293244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric vs. non-parametric statistics of low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA).
    Thatcher RW; North D; Biver C
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15683191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians.
    Applegate KE; Tello R; Ying J
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 12881587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact and Monte carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):749-54. PubMed ID: 11153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Do we always correctly interpret the results of statistical nonparametric tests].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2014; 71(11):654-8. PubMed ID: 25799864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Rank transformations--the connection between nonparametric and parametric statistics].
    Su BH; Shi BZ
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Sep; 23(5):274-8. PubMed ID: 2625061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advice on statistical analysis for Circulation Research.
    Kusuoka H; Hoffman JI
    Circ Res; 2002 Oct; 91(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 12386142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical research XVI. Differences between medians with the Mann-Whitney U test].
    Rivas-Ruiz R; Moreno-Palacios J; Talavera JO
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24021070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice of student's t- or Wilcoxon-based confidence intervals for assessment of average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Bois FY; Steinijans VW; Anderson S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 9056597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A SAS(®) macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal-Wallis analysis.
    Elliott AC; Hynan LS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Apr; 102(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21146248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On sample size of the kruskal-wallis test with application to a mouse peritoneal cavity study.
    Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 20345499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trials: robust tests are wonderful for imperfect data.
    Cleophas TJ
    Am J Ther; 2015; 22(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 23896742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A nonparametric approach to the discrimination of two cell populations.
    Peet FG; Sahota TS
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 6359994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric and non-parametric tests for the overall comparison of several treatments to a control when treatment is expected to increase variability.
    Troendle JF; Blair RC; Rumsey D; Moke P
    Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(23):2729-39. PubMed ID: 9421872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.