These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2641339)

  • 1. The "peer review" system needs to be changed.
    Hill GJ
    J Cancer Educ; 1989; 4(3):191-2. PubMed ID: 2641339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter: Peer review.
    Westhead EW
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1679. PubMed ID: 4827513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review reviewed.
    Mehl JW
    Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review of health services research grant applications.
    McFall D
    Inquiry; 1978 Sep; 15(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 151070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial: Judicium parium.
    Fishman AP
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Jan; 290(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 4808447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial: Funding medical research.
    Caldwell PR
    Med Times; 1974 Aug; 102(8):17-21. PubMed ID: 4845589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise.
    Wyngaarden JB
    P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visceral viewpoints. Goals and controls - grants and contracts.
    Spiro HM
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(11):545-7. PubMed ID: 1152879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proposal for public archive draws support, criticism.
    Travis K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1416. PubMed ID: 15467028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Innovation needs novel thinking.
    Leshner AI
    Science; 2011 May; 332(6033):1009. PubMed ID: 21617043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science, Freedom, and Accountability. Ninth annual Becton, Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetzky Memorial Lecture.
    Edwards CC
    Anesth Analg; 1974; 53(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 4858242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Washington report: a conversation with Vincent T. DeVita, Jr., M.D.. Interview by Daniel S. Greenberg.
    DeVita VT
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(17):1014-6. PubMed ID: 7412849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Institutes of Health yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
    Fredrickson DS
    Public Health Rep; 1978; 93(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 362469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. science funding. DOE cures pork project with peer review.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2007 May; 316(5825):674. PubMed ID: 17478687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Again, army shuns AIDS peer review.
    Science; 1994 Oct; 266(5183):207. PubMed ID: 7939648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. science policy. Peer review not popular at Homeland Security.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5954):779. PubMed ID: 19892948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.