These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26413499)

  • 1. Evaluation of Motor Neuron Excitability by CMAP Scanning with Electric Modulated Current.
    Araújo T; Candeias R; Nunes N; Gamboa H
    Neurosci J; 2015; 2015():360648. PubMed ID: 26413499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations.
    Maathuis EM; Henderson RD; Drenthen J; Hutchinson NM; Daube JR; Blok JH; Visser GH
    J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj; 2012 Jun; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 22546084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the use of different waveforms for intravesical electrical stimulation: a study in the rat.
    De Bock F; Dirckx J; Wyndaele JJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 21181961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quadriceps femoris muscle torques and fatigue generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with three different waveforms.
    Laufer Y; Ries JD; Leininger PM; Alon G
    Phys Ther; 2001 Jul; 81(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 11444994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
    Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Waveform parameters of recurrent inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in cat motoneurons during time-varying activation patterns.
    Boorman G; Windhorst U; Kirmayer D
    Neuroscience; 1994 Dec; 63(3):747-56. PubMed ID: 7898674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulation of the muscle and nerve compound muscle action potential by evoked pain.
    Duez L; Qerama E; Jensen TS; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
    Scand J Pain; 2015 Jan; 6(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 29911580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of selected stimulus waveforms on pulse and phase characteristics at sensory and motor thresholds.
    Kantor G; Alon G; Ho HS
    Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 74(10):951-62. PubMed ID: 8090846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation.
    Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.
    Kammer T; Beck S; Thielscher A; Laubis-Herrmann U; Topka H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 112(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 11165526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability.
    Zafar N; Paulus W; Sommer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1393-9. PubMed ID: 18400556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transthoracic defibrillation of swine with monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Gliner BE; Lyster TE; Dillion SM; Bardy GH
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1634-43. PubMed ID: 7664451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse charge and not waveform affects M-wave properties during progressive motor unit activation.
    Botter A; Merletti R; Minetto MA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 18455437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating motor unit numbers from a CMAP scan.
    Bostock H
    Muscle Nerve; 2016 Jun; 53(6):889-96. PubMed ID: 26479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of waveform on comfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    Baker LL; Bowman BR; McNeal DR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Aug; (233):75-85. PubMed ID: 3261222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts.
    Swartz JF; Jones JL; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1991 Feb; 68(2):438-49. PubMed ID: 1991348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.
    Murray LM; Knikou M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1841-1852. PubMed ID: 31079235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.
    Niehaus L; Meyer BU; Weyh T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 111(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10656513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Bardy GH; Ivey TD; Allen MD; Johnson G; Mehra R; Greene HL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 2768721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.