These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26413540)
21. Gender differences of the morphology of the distal femur and proximal tibia in a Korean population. Lim HC; Bae JH; Yoon JY; Kim SJ; Kim JG; Lee JM Knee; 2013 Jan; 20(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 22721912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploring inter-subject anatomic variability using a population of patient-specific femurs and a statistical shape and intensity model. Bah MT; Shi J; Browne M; Suchier Y; Lefebvre F; Young P; King L; Dunlop DG; Heller MO Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):995-1007. PubMed ID: 26363532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The collodiaphyseal angle of the femur in adult Nigerians. Nwoha PU Afr J Med Med Sci; 1991 Jun; 20(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 1908622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Proportions of the femur and humerus in relation to bone length]. Rother P; Krüger G; Schramek G Anat Anz; 1985; 160(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 4073525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population. Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 17624707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Creation of a simple distal femur morphology classification system. Everhart JS; Chaudhari AM; Flanigan DC J Orthop Res; 2016 Jun; 34(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 26573967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is there any relation between distal parameters of the femur and its height and width? Yazar F; Imre N; Battal B; Bilgic S; Tayfun C Surg Radiol Anat; 2012 Mar; 34(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 21739247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant. Purkait R Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 15567617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal. Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of automated three-dimensional image reconstruction of the femur from postmortem computed tomography data in morphometry for victim identification. Hishmat AM; Michiue T; Sogawa N; Oritani S; Ishikawa T; Hashem MA; Maeda H Leg Med (Tokyo); 2014 Mar; 16(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 24491519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sex estimation using the femur of Austrians born in the 19th to the middle of the 20th century. Kanz F; Fitzl C; Vlcek A; Frommlet F Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 25776530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anthropometric measurements of the human distal femur: a study of the adult Malay population. Hussain F; Abdul Kadir MR; Zulkifly AH; Sa'at A; Aziz AA; Hossain G; Kamarul T; Syahrom A Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():175056. PubMed ID: 24294597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. To 3D or not to 3D, that is the question: do 3D surface analyses improve the ecomorphological power of the distal femur in placental mammals? Gould FD PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91719. PubMed ID: 24633081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck. Isaac B; Vettivel S; Prasad R; Jeyaseelan L; Chandi G Clin Anat; 1997; 10(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9283729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differences in femoral morphology among the Orientals and Caucasians: a comparative study using plain radiographs. Siddiqi N; Valdevit A; Chao EYS Anat Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 94(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 29951777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population. du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction. Guenoun B; Zadegan F; Aim F; Hannouche D; Nizard R Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Sep; 98(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 22858107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sex-based differences in the anthropometric characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relation to intercondylar notch geometry: a cadaveric study. Chandrashekar N; Slauterbeck J; Hashemi J Am J Sports Med; 2005 Oct; 33(10):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16009992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dimensions of the intercondylar notch of the knee. Koukoubis TD; Glisson RR; Bolognesi M; Vail TP Am J Knee Surg; 1997; 10(2):83-7; discussion 87-8. PubMed ID: 9131238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]