These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26414882)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016.
    Keen JD; Keen JM; Keen JE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jan; 15(1 Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 28993109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Gur D; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Ganott M; Hakim C; Hardesty L; Poller WR; Shah R; Wallace L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Zhang Z; Marques HS; Edward Hendrick R; Yaffe MJ; Pisano ED
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 25247960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Smith RA; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Monsees BS; Sickles EA; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Onega TL
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 24960110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.