These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

917 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26415500)

  • 1. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.
    Zou G; Donner A
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 15339305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profile likelihood-based confidence interval of the intraclass correlation for binary outcome data sampled from clusters.
    Saha KK
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3982-4002. PubMed ID: 22826179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for the common intraclass correlation in the analysis of clustered binary responses.
    Saha KK; Wang S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(4):682-697. PubMed ID: 28992422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials.
    Wu S; Crespi CM; Wong WK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):869-80. PubMed ID: 22627076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence interval estimation for treatment effects in cluster randomization trials based on ranks.
    Zou G
    Stat Med; 2021 Jun; 40(14):3227-3250. PubMed ID: 33942338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Covariate-adjusted confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shoukri MM; Donner A; El-Dali A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 23871746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Donner A; Wells G
    Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):401-12. PubMed ID: 3741978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.