These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26415930)

  • 1. The case for using country-specific scoring coefficients for scoring the SF-12, with scoring implications for the SF-36.
    Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 26415930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Gandek B; Ware JE; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier JE; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplege A; Prieto L; Sullivan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1171-8. PubMed ID: 9817135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions.
    Wilson D; Parsons J; Tucker G
    Soz Praventivmed; 2000; 45(6):239-46. PubMed ID: 11210594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Ware JE; Gandek B; Kosinski M; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Prieto L; Sullivan M; Thunedborg K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 9817134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The SF-36v2 and SF-12v2 health surveys in New Zealand: norms, scoring coefficients and cross-country comparisons.
    Frieling MA; Davis WR; Chiang G
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Feb; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23379802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Keller SD; Ware JE; Bentler PM; Aaronson NK; Alonso J; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Sullivan M; Gandek B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9817136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires.
    Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
    Qual Life Res; 2010 Sep; 19(7):1069-76. PubMed ID: 20440565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.
    Farivar SS; Cunningham WE; Hays RD
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Sep; 5():54. PubMed ID: 17825096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Ware JE; Kosinski M; Gandek B; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bech P; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Prieto L; Sullivan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1159-65. PubMed ID: 9817133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results from several population studies show that recommended scoring methods of the SF-36 and the SF-12 may lead to incorrect conclusions and subsequent health decisions.
    Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Oct; 23(8):2195-203. PubMed ID: 24648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: a comparison of different scoring algorithms.
    Fleishman JA; Selim AJ; Kazis LE
    Qual Life Res; 2010 Mar; 19(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 20094805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 version 2 - an alternative scoring method can correct the problem.
    Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61191. PubMed ID: 23593428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scoring the SF-36 in Orthopaedics: A Brief Guide.
    Laucis NC; Hays RD; Bhattacharyya T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 97(19):1628-34. PubMed ID: 26446970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.
    Kathe N; Hayes CJ; Bhandari NR; Payakachat N
    Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 29680100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey.
    Mbada CE; Adeogun GA; Ogunlana MO; Adedoyin RA; Akinsulore A; Awotidebe TO; Idowu OA; Olaoye OA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Sep; 13():141. PubMed ID: 26370833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring physical and mental health using the SF-12: implications for community surveys of mental health.
    Windsor TD; Rodgers B; Butterworth P; Anstey KJ; Jorm AF
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 40(9):797-803. PubMed ID: 16911756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beware of the origin of numbers: Standard scoring of the SF-12 and SF-36 summary measures distorts measurement and score interpretations.
    Hagell P; Westergren A; Årestedt K
    Res Nurs Health; 2017 Aug; 40(4):378-386. PubMed ID: 28732149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decomposition of sources of income-related health inequality applied on SF-36 summary scores: a Danish health survey.
    Gundgaard J; Lauridsen J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Aug; 4():53. PubMed ID: 16925801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the equivalence of translations of widely used response choice labels: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
    Keller SD; Ware JE; Gandek B; Aaronson NK; Alonso J; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Fukuhara S; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Sanson-Fisher RW; Sullivan M; Wood-Dauphinee S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):933-44. PubMed ID: 9817110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.