These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26416143)

  • 1. A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials.
    Townsend D; Mills N; Savović J; Donovan JL
    Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():432. PubMed ID: 26416143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials.
    Donovan JL; Paramasivan S; de Salis I; Toerien M
    Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():5. PubMed ID: 24393291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).
    Wade J; Elliott D; Avery KNL; Gaunt D; Young GJ; Barnes R; Paramasivan S; Campbell WB; Blazeby JM; Birtle AJ; Stein RC; Beard DJ; Halliday AW; Donovan JL; ; ; ; ; ;
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28716064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
    Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT - Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing.
    Paramasivan S; Strong S; Wilson C; Campbell B; Blazeby JM; Donovan JL
    Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():88. PubMed ID: 25873096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages.
    Ekambareshwar M; Mihrshahi S; Wen LM; Taki S; Bennett G; Baur LA; Rissel C
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):494. PubMed ID: 30219067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials.
    Rooshenas L; Elliott D; Wade J; Jepson M; Paramasivan S; Strong S; Wilson C; Beard D; Blazeby JM; Birtle A; Halliday A; Rogers CA; Stein R; Donovan JL; ; ; ; ; ;
    PLoS Med; 2016 Oct; 13(10):e1002147. PubMed ID: 27755555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches.
    Elliott D; Husbands S; Hamdy FC; Holmberg L; Donovan JL
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):789-798. PubMed ID: 28578829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Farrar N; Elliott D; Houghton C; Jepson M; Mills N; Paramasivan S; Plumb L; Wade J; Young B; Donovan JL; Rooshenas L
    Trials; 2022 Oct; 23(1):883. PubMed ID: 36266700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative analysis of feasibility of recruitment and retention in a planned randomised controlled trial of a psychosocial cancer intervention within the NHS.
    Duncan M; Korszun A; White P; Eva G;
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):327. PubMed ID: 29929536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011).
    Paramasivan S; Huddart R; Hall E; Lewis R; Birtle A; Donovan JL
    Trials; 2011 Mar; 12():78. PubMed ID: 21406089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences.
    Mills N; Blazeby JM; Hamdy FC; Neal DE; Campbell B; Wilson C; Paramasivan S; Donovan JL
    Trials; 2014 Aug; 15():323. PubMed ID: 25115160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design.
    Richards DA; Ross S; Robens S; Borglin G
    Trials; 2014 Oct; 15():398. PubMed ID: 25318374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled 'study within a trial' (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource.
    Jolly K; Sidhu M; ; Bower P; Madurasinghe V;
    Trials; 2019 Jul; 20(1):453. PubMed ID: 31340853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying the participant characteristics that predict recruitment and retention of participants to randomised controlled trials involving children: a systematic review.
    Robinson L; Adair P; Coffey M; Harris R; Burnside G
    Trials; 2016 Jun; 17(1):294. PubMed ID: 27334018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project.
    Smith V; Delaney H; Hunter A; Torgerson D; Treweek S; Gamble C; Mills N; Stanbury K; Dempsey E; Daly M; O'Shea J; Weatherup K; Deshpande S; Ryan MA; Lowe J; Black G; Devane D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):265. PubMed ID: 37951890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of education and training interventions on trial recruitment; a systematic review.
    Delaney H; Devane D; Hunter A; Hennessy M; Parker A; Murphy L; Cronin P; Smith V
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():75-82. PubMed ID: 31128220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings.
    Dickson S; Logan J; Hagen S; Stark D; Glazener C; McDonald AM; McPherson G
    Trials; 2013 Nov; 14():389. PubMed ID: 24228935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training health professionals to recruit into challenging randomized controlled trials improved confidence: the development of the QuinteT randomized controlled trial recruitment training intervention.
    Mills N; Gaunt D; Blazeby JM; Elliott D; Husbands S; Holding P; Rooshenas L; Jepson M; Young B; Bower P; Tudur Smith C; Gamble C; Donovan JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():34-44. PubMed ID: 29191445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011).
    Moynihan C; Lewis R; Hall E; Jones E; Birtle A; Huddart R;
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():228. PubMed ID: 23190503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.