These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26416377)

  • 1. Evaluating quality across minimally invasive platforms in colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Ibarra S; Madhoun N; Tahilramani R; Mahmood A; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26416377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study.
    Keller DS; Ibarra S; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Ponte OM; Madhoun N; Pickron TB; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):739-744. PubMed ID: 26092004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery.
    Keller DS; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Sandhu J; Ibarra S; Madhoun N; Haas EM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Oct; 19(10):1875-9. PubMed ID: 26282851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of 626 Patients.
    Sangster W; Messaris E; Berg AS; Stewart DB
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep; 58(9):862-9. PubMed ID: 26252848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Keller DS; Reif de Paula T; Ikner TP; Saidi H; Schoonyoung H; H Marks J
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Mar; 38(3):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 38177611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pilot study of a novel pain management strategy: evaluating the impact on patient outcomes.
    Keller DS; Tahilramani RN; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Ibarra S; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26275549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study.
    Keller DS; Madhoun N; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Ibarra S; Tahilramani R; Haas EM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Mar; 20(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 26704536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery: status and technical specifications.
    Keller DS; Ibarra S; Haas EM
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 26149521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
    Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.
    Papaconstantinou HT; Sharp N; Thomas JS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Jul; 213(1):72-80; discussion 80-2. PubMed ID: 21420878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
    Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations.
    Casillas MA; Leichtle SW; Wahl WL; Lampman RM; Welch KB; Wellock T; Madden EB; Cleary RK
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul; 208(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24239530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initiating statistical process control to improve quality outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS; Stulberg JJ; Lawrence JK; Samia H; Delaney CP
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3559-64. PubMed ID: 25701062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery.
    Fung AK; Aly EH
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1353-64. PubMed ID: 22961513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy.
    Adair J; Gromski MA; Lim RB; Nagle D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1549-54. PubMed ID: 20940605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
    Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Levic K; Donatsky AM; Bulut O; Rosenberg J
    Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 25377216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.