BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26417963)

  • 1. Nonidentical twins: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian lasso for Cox models.
    Zucknick M; Saadati M; Benner A
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):959-81. PubMed ID: 26417963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
    Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 19937997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gradient lasso for Cox proportional hazards model.
    Sohn I; Kim J; Jung SH; Park C
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(14):1775-81. PubMed ID: 19447787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical extensions of the lasso penalty to reduce the false discovery rate in high-dimensional Cox regression models.
    Ternès N; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2561-73. PubMed ID: 26970107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust estimation of the expected survival probabilities from high-dimensional Cox models with biomarker-by-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials.
    Ternès N; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 May; 17(1):83. PubMed ID: 28532387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applications of Bayesian shrinkage prior models in clinical research with categorical responses.
    Bhattacharyya A; Pal S; Mitra R; Rai S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35484507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian versus frequentist hypotheses testing in clinical trials with dichotomous and countable outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):985-97. PubMed ID: 20721786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci.
    Xu S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 17688503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fused lasso algorithm for Cox' proportional hazards and binomial logit models with application to copy number profiles.
    Chaturvedi N; de Menezes RX; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2014 May; 56(3):477-92. PubMed ID: 24496763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A permutation approach for selecting the penalty parameter in penalized model selection.
    Sabourin JA; Valdar W; Nobel AB
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):1185-94. PubMed ID: 26243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
    Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian proportional hazards model with time-varying regression coefficients: a penalized Poisson regression approach.
    Lambert P; Eilers PH
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3977-89. PubMed ID: 16320263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Bayesian adaptive lasso regression.
    Alhamzawi R; Ali HTM
    Math Biosci; 2018 Sep; 303():75-82. PubMed ID: 29920251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Bayesian Covariance Lasso.
    Khondker ZS; Zhu H; Chu H; Lin W; Ibrahim JG
    Stat Interface; 2013 Apr; 6(2):243-259. PubMed ID: 24551316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel non-negative Bayesian stacking modeling method for Cancer survival prediction using high-dimensional omics data.
    Shen J; Wang S; Sun H; Huang J; Bai L; Wang X; Dong Y; Tang Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):105. PubMed ID: 38702624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian semiparametric analysis of recurrent failure time data using copulas.
    Meyer R; Romeo JS
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):982-1001. PubMed ID: 26153049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian two-step Lasso strategy for biomarker selection in personalized medicine development for time-to-event endpoints.
    Gu X; Yin G; Lee JJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Nov; 36(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 24075829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian random-effects threshold regression with application to survival data with nonproportional hazards.
    Pennell ML; Whitmore GA; Ting Lee ML
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 19828558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.