These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26418505)

  • 1. [Health registries: methodological issues].
    Bruzzi P
    Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Sep; 106(9):436-43. PubMed ID: 26418505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient registries: utility, validity and inference.
    Richesson R; Vehik K
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 686():87-104. PubMed ID: 20824441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology.
    Jagsi R; Bekelman JE; Chen A; Chen RC; Hoffman K; Shih YC; Smith BD; Yu JB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 25195986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the SEER Cancer Registry for technology assessment.
    Klawansky S; Burdick E; Adams M; Bollini P; Orza M; Falotico-Taylor J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 1864697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiologyA study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use.
    Sørensen HT
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 1997; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 23511270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the quality of health technology registers for national guidance development.
    Mandeville KL; Patrick H; McKenna T; Harris K
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Apr; 28(2):220-223. PubMed ID: 29020400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.
    Gavrielov-Yusim N; Friger M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Mar; 68(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 24248997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technology assessment in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study.
    Burdick E; Falotico-Taylor J; Young JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 1864701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a clinical data registry to evaluate medical technologies. Experience from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry.
    Rimm AA; Barr JT; Horowitz MM; Bortin MM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 1864702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospects for research in haemophilia with real-world data-An analysis of German registry and secondary data.
    Schopohl D; Bidlingmaier C; Herzig D; Klamroth R; Kurnik K; Rublee D; Schramm W; Schwarzkopf L; Berger K
    Haemophilia; 2018 Jul; 24(4):584-594. PubMed ID: 29488669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using medical registries and data sets for technology assessment.
    Antczak-Bouckoms A; Burdick E; Klawansky S; Mosteller F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 1864695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Pragmatic randomized controlled trials as a source of data in the assessment of effectiveness of medical technology].
    Kaczyński L; Solnica B
    Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 23401993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.
    Logan JR; Lieberman DA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):717-34. PubMed ID: 20889074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Healthcare Databases in Thailand and Japan: Potential Sources for Health Technology Assessment Research.
    Saokaew S; Sugimoto T; Kamae I; Pratoomsoot C; Chaiyakunapruk N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141993. PubMed ID: 26560127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunities and pitfalls of registry data for clinical research.
    Psoter KJ; Rosenfeld M
    Paediatr Respir Rev; 2013 Sep; 14(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 23707656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Database and Registry Research in Orthopaedic Surgery: Part 2: Clinical Registry Data.
    Pugely AJ; Martin CT; Harwood J; Ong KL; Bozic KJ; Callaghan JJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1799-808. PubMed ID: 26537168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a multicenter peripheral arterial interventional database: the PVD-QI2.
    Mukherjee D; Munir K; Hirsch AT; Chetcuti S; Grossman PM; Rajagopalan S; Nallamothu BK; Moscucci M; Henke P; Kassab E; Sohal C; Riba A; Person D; Luciano AE; DeGregorio M; Patel K; Rutkowski KC; Eagle KA
    Am Heart J; 2005 Jun; 149(6):1003-8. PubMed ID: 15976781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using medical registries and data sets for technology assessment. An overview of seven case studies.
    Klawansky S; Antczak-Bouckoms A; Barr J; Burdick E; Roberts MS; Wyshak G; Mosteller F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 1864703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology assessment in the Connecticut Tumor Registry.
    Wyshak G; Burdick E; Mosteller F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 1864696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.